Media Bias in Political Reporting: A Case Study of the White House and Fox News

  • News
  • Thread starter math_04
  • Start date
  • Tags
    News
In summary, President Obama has called out a TV station for constantly attacking his administration, specifically mentioning Fox News. He believes that the network has a large platform to spread negative stories about him and has been spreading lies, such as him being a Muslim and having ties to domestic terrorists. However, some people argue that Fox News is simply biased rather than intentionally spreading lies.
  • #1
math_04
23
0
Well, President Obama has attacked an unnamed TV station for constantly attacking his administration. hmmm...i wonder which network it is:wink:

http://www.businessandmedia.org/articles/2009/20090616181219.aspx
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
“It’s very hard for me to swallow that one,” Obama said. “First of all, I’ve got one television station that is entirely devoted to attacking my administration,” he added, chuckling.

“I assume you’re talking about Fox,” Harwood replied.

“Well, that’s a pretty big megaphone and you’d be hard-pressed if you watched the entire day to find a positive story about me on that front,” Obama said.
This doesn't exactly read like an attack on Fox.
 
  • #3
Well, judging from the lies that Fox News has been spreading about Obama in the last year or so, I am surprised he has stayed silent and calm. It is one thing to criticize his policies in an educated manner and another thing to throw slurs at him.
 
  • #4
math_04 said:
Well, judging from the lies that Fox News has been spreading about Obama in the last year or so, I am surprised he has stayed silent and calm. It is one thing to criticize his policies in an educated manner and another thing to throw slurs at him.

Not that I necessarily disbelieve you but what lies in particular?
 
  • #5
Not that I necessarily disbelieve you but what lies in particular?

Where should I start? The lies about Barack Obama being part of ACORN and and that he was friends with a whole group of domestic terrorists. The lies about him being a Muslim, Arab (no disrespect meant at that demographic and was blatant racism by Fox) and was planning to sell America to terrorists, the lies about him being anti Semitic which I find ridiculous and a whole heap of other hate promoting, racist material.
 
  • #6
math_04 said:
Where should I start? The lies about Barack Obama being part of ACORN and and that he was friends with a whole group of domestic terrorists. The lies about him being a Muslim, Arab (no disrespect meant at that demographic and was blatant racism by Fox) and was planning to sell America to terrorists, the lies about him being anti Semitic which I find ridiculous and a whole heap of other hate promoting, racist material.

You'll have to provide some evidence, else this thread is simply unfounded accusation.
 
  • #7






Well, I got as many as I can find. For the whole collection, just type Obama Fox News on youtube, trust me, it won't be that hard
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #8
math_04 said:
Well, I got as many as I can find.
You wasted my time. :grumpy: I watched the first one and half of the second, and heard nothing related to the accusitions you were asked to defend. Post something relevant, or don't post at all.
 
  • Like
Likes mheslep
  • #9
math_04 said:


Well, I watched the first one. Clearly, this is not Fox saying that "Obama wants to be called Hussein"-- this is a random guest on a Fox news show saying that. The Fox host pulls her up on it and, after he says "where did you read that" she says "I dunno." This is misrepresentation of the news channel. I'm not watching the rest!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
Sorry about the first one, my bad. All the evidence I have got so far comes from watching the channel over a period of time and I made a sloppy effort in my haste to find clips of Fox News at their finest. Again, its best you do your own research and come up with your conclusions. All I am pointing out is their bias and outright lies in some cases from having watched the channel for a while now, to get evidence in this case takes time and effort :smile:. Hopefully soon, I can find it and then ill post what I can up.
 
  • #11
math_04 said:
Again, its best you do your own research and come up with your conclusions.
You do the research. You're the one making assertions, it's your job to back them up.
 
  • #12
You do the research. You're the one making assertions, it's your job to back them up.

Yes, I will once I have enough time on my hands.
 
  • #13
I am sorry, this is so stupid! Simply watch one hour of Fox "news". Anyone that does not think that Fox "news" is biased, well ...
 
  • #14
wittgenstein said:
I am sorry, this is so stupid! Simply watch one hour of Fox "news". Anyone that does not think that Fox "news" is biased, well ...

There's a difference between having a bias and spreading lies. The OP is accusing, without backup, that Fox is doing the latter.
 
  • #15
For the research challenged
Just one example among thousands,
“Obama Says U.S. Is a ‘Muslim Country"
Fox headline
What Obama actually said

“If you actually took the number of Muslim Americans, we’d be one of the largest Muslim countries in the world.”
Anyway, I do not have time for this. Next someone will want me to prove that the Earth is not flat.
 
  • #16
cristo said:
There's a difference between having a bias and spreading lies. The OP is accusing, without backup, that Fox is doing the latter.
Well that's interesting. Because Fox has became professional in being borderline between spreading lies and just having people carefully chosen so that their audience hear what they want to hear, which often has nothing to do with truth. Which is worse ?
 
  • #17
wittgenstein said:
For the research challenged
Just one example among thousands,
“Obama Says U.S. Is a ‘Muslim Country"
Fox headline
What Obama actually said

“If you actually took the number of Muslim Americans, we’d be one of the largest Muslim countries in the world.”
Anyway, I do not have time for this. Next someone will want me to prove that the Earth is not flat.

Do you not know the difference between providing evidence and putting comments in quotations without saying exactly where they have come from?

If you provide a source proving that Fox made some of these comments then you can accuse them of spreading lies. Without such source, your comments mean nothing (and, I should add, are against the P&WA forum rules).
 
  • #18
wittgenstein said:
For the research challenged
Just one example among thousands,
“Obama Says U.S. Is a ‘Muslim Country"
Fox headline
What Obama actually said

“If you actually took the number of Muslim Americans, we’d be one of the largest Muslim countries in the world.”
Anyway, I do not have time for this. Next someone will want me to prove that the Earth is not flat.

That's called "spin". Spin can often be virtually the same in effect as lying but there is certainly a difference.

For example I could say "President Obama Attacks Fox News" and it wouldn't necessarily be a lie but it isn't necessarily true either. One could say that it is quite easy to deduce that Obama is referring to Fox news and someone else could say that it doesn't matter because he never explicitly refers to them and so we can not accuse him of doing so.

Similarly one could say it is obvious in the quote you have produced that Obama's intention was not to refer to the US as a "Muslim Country" and another could say that taking his verbiage literally he is referring to the US as such regardless of his intent.

This is one of the reasons why they have speech writers who spend sometimes days carefully crafting the presidents words. Its an attempt to prevent anyone from reading other intentions into his words either accidentally or purposefully.
 
  • #19
Locked pending moderation.

Please read the rules. Statements of opinion as truth are a violation of the guideliens. All such statements must be backed up with information from valid sources.
 

What is "The White House vs Fox News"?

"The White House vs Fox News" refers to the ongoing conflict between the White House administration and the Fox News network, specifically regarding the network's coverage of the administration and its policies.

Why is there a conflict between the White House and Fox News?

The conflict between the White House and Fox News stems from the network's perceived bias towards the administration's political opponents and its critical coverage of the administration's actions and policies.

How has the White House responded to Fox News?

The White House has responded to Fox News by publicly criticizing the network's coverage and accusing it of spreading misinformation and propaganda. The administration has also refused to provide interviews or access to administration officials to Fox News reporters.

What has Fox News said about the White House's response?

Fox News has defended its coverage and denied any bias, stating that it is committed to providing fair and balanced reporting. The network has also accused the White House of attempting to suppress free speech and press freedom.

How has the conflict between the White House and Fox News impacted the media landscape?

The conflict between the White House and Fox News has contributed to the polarized media landscape in the United States, with each side accusing the other of spreading false information and manipulating public opinion. It has also raised concerns about the role of media in shaping public perception and the relationship between the government and the press.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
3
Replies
87
Views
10K
Replies
37
Views
9K
  • General Discussion
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
11
Replies
384
Views
38K
  • General Discussion
8
Replies
253
Views
25K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
69
Views
7K
Back
Top