Theories about the beginning of the universe

In summary, Garth welcomes Amit from Israel to the forum and encourages him to ask questions. He explains that the Big Bang theory is the most accepted explanation for the beginning of the universe, supported by evidence such as the Hubble Red shift, Cosmic Microwave Background, and the composition of the universe. However, he also mentions that there are other theories, such as the possibility of a bounce from a previous universe, that cannot be ruled out. Ultimately, the theories about the beginning of the universe are still being researched and debated.
  • #1
amitmis
2
0
hello,

i'm amit from israel, and i'd love to be an activated member in your forum.

my first question - are there other theories about the beginning of the univers. except of "the big bang" (not religion)?

thanks,
amit
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
amitmis said:
hello,

i'm amit from israel, and i'd love to be an activated member in your forum.

my first question - are there other theories about the beginning of the univers. except of "the big bang" (not religion)?

thanks,
amit
Hello amit from Israel, I'm Garth from England, welcome to these Forums!

You will get the opportunity to ask many questions here because that is how we learn!

There is strong evidence that the universe went through a period of intense compression and temperature from which it has expanded, the Big Bang.

The three main pieces of evidence are:
1. The Hubble Red shift, interpreted as a Doppler shift of the other galaxies and quasars, which are receding from us as the consequence of that expansion.
2. The Cosmic Microwave Background which is an all-surrounding bath of radiation at a temperature of 2.70K. This if you like is the 'echo' of the BB, received not as a sound but as a 'flash' of radiation now much red shifted into the microwave region of the electromagnetic spectrum.
3. When all the nucleosynthesis that has gone on inside stars has been taken into account it seems that the original mix before our galaxy and its stars existed was about 3/4 hydrogen and 1/4 helium (by mass). How can this be explained? When the BB is considered as a vast nuclear explosion and the nuclear reactions worked out it transpires that what should come out of the BB should be 3/4 hydrogen and 1/4 helium (by mass)! This agreement is very difficult to explain otherwise.


The accepted and tested theory of gravity, General Relativity, allows one to predict back from the present into the very first moments of the BB and GR on its own does not allow an alternative to an initial singularity (zero volume, infinite mass density and temperature). However at some stage GR must break down as the entire universe is then compressed into a region over which quantum effects would predominate. It is possible that such effects might (when predicting backwards in time) enable the BB singularity to be avoided. There might have been a 'bounce' from an earlier universe. The BB certainly is a beginning of our universe but of conjecture about other universes there is no end, unfortunately we can't see any of them!

So there are different theories about the beginning of the universe. Of course it also all depends on what units of mass, length and time you use, and how you make measurements at the other end of the universe. But such approaches are probably a bit advanced for now!

Garth
 
Last edited:

1. What is the Big Bang Theory?

The Big Bang Theory is a scientific theory that explains the beginning of the universe. It states that approximately 13.8 billion years ago, all matter and energy in the universe was contained in a single point, known as a singularity. This singularity then expanded rapidly, creating the universe as we know it today.

2. What evidence supports the Big Bang Theory?

One of the key pieces of evidence for the Big Bang Theory is the cosmic microwave background radiation, which is essentially leftover heat from the early stages of the universe. Other evidence includes the abundance of light elements in the universe, the expansion of the universe, and the redshift of distant galaxies.

3. Are there any alternative theories to the Big Bang?

Yes, there are several alternative theories to the Big Bang, such as the Steady State Theory and the Multiverse Theory. However, the Big Bang Theory is currently the most widely accepted and supported theory for the beginning of the universe.

4. How does the Big Bang Theory explain the formation of galaxies and stars?

According to the Big Bang Theory, after the initial expansion of the singularity, the universe continued to expand and cool. As it cooled, matter began to clump together due to gravity, eventually forming galaxies and stars. The exact process of galaxy and star formation is still being studied and understood by scientists.

5. Can the Big Bang Theory be proven?

The Big Bang Theory is a scientific theory, which means it is based on evidence and can be tested and refined through further research and observations. While it cannot be definitively proven, the overwhelming amount of evidence and support for the theory makes it the most likely explanation for the beginning of the universe.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Cosmology
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Back
Top