Thin-Film Optical Coatings

  • Thread starter pphy427
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Optical
In summary, the jewelry maker has asked your glass studio to create a sheet of dichroic glass that will appear red (wavelength=692 nm) for transmitted light and blue (wavelength=519 nm) for reflected light. If you use a MgF2 coating (n=1.39), the coating should be thicknessed to be 1.5 microns.f
  • #1
2
0

Homework Statement


A jewelry maker has asked your glass studio to produce a sheet of dichroic glass that will appear red (wavelength=692 nm) for transmitted light and blue (wavelength=519 nm) for reflected light. If you use a MgF2 coating (n=1.39), how thick should the coating be.


Homework Equations



for constructive interference: lambda = (2nd)/m
for destructive interference: lambda = (2nd)/(m-.5)


The Attempt at a Solution


Both constructive and destructive interference of the reflected waves are required here, at different wavelengths. I think we need to minimize the red for reflection and maximize the blue. I really don't know how to make sense of this problem. I'm sorry I don't have a better attempt. I will really appreciate any help you can offer. Thanks so much!
 
  • #2
I'm having the same issue with this same problem. Just to rephrase the formulas,

Constructive Thickness = [tex]\lambda[/tex]m / 2*n
Destructive Thickness = [tex]\lambda[/tex](m-.5) / 2*n

I figured the same; that we wanted to maximize blue reflection and minimize red. So far, I've tried solving for the value that makes the red destructive, and tried a few multiples of it (in other words, a few m values) in comparison to the blue construcive in hope I'd find an integer match (ie a 5/4 or something ratio so I can figure the m's), but no luck on that. I've only got one crack at it left, so I want to make sure I get it.
 
  • #3
ok, I've been working at this one and i think it's way easier than i thought it was.

we know that the film is the same in both conditions so if we solve both the constructive and destructive formulas for "d" we can find a corresponding "m" value. whether you use the situation where blue is constructive and red is destructive or vice versa, you'll eventually get the same answer.
 
  • #4
I see what you mean. Got it to work; I used m=2. Just takes a little guess-and-check.

Thanks
 
  • #5
I'm having the same issue with this same problem. Just to rephrase the formulas,

Constructive Thickness = [tex]\lambda[/tex]m / 2*n
Destructive Thickness = [tex]\lambda[/tex](m-.5) / 2*n

I figured the same; that we wanted to maximize blue reflection and minimize red. So far, I've tried solving for the value that makes the red destructive, and tried a few multiples of it (in other words, a few m values) in comparison to the blue construcive in hope I'd find an integer match (ie a 5/4 or something ratio so I can figure the m's), but no luck on that. I've only got one crack at it left, so I want to make sure I get it.
However, you have to take into account the phase change due to n=1.54. So in this case, the equation for blue max is t= [tex]\lambda[/tex](m+.5) / 2*n
 

Suggested for: Thin-Film Optical Coatings

Replies
19
Views
468
Replies
2
Views
508
Replies
1
Views
244
Replies
1
Views
456
Replies
1
Views
483
Replies
8
Views
529
Replies
1
Views
723
Replies
6
Views
616
Replies
1
Views
730
Replies
5
Views
836
Back
Top