Thinking Without Language: Problem Solving Inhibited?

  • Thread starter The Grimmus
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Thinking
In summary: Problem solving is not inhibited, but it's more difficult because you're not relying on words to represent your thoughts.
  • #1
The Grimmus
200
0
When we think we think using words for the most part maybe with an imgae or two for color but mostly we think in words. How dose one go about thinking without a language like an infiante or another anmial. is problem solving inhibted ?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #2
I believe that feelings that represent things and ideas interact in a way much like those things and ideas interact, and that these feelings are the true language of the mind, and so we can understand how things react without words. Have you ever understood something without words? It's like that. I believe feelings can go even farther into thought than words can, and are more easily managed. Furthermore, I think that all words have feelings attatched to them and that is how we are able to think with words.
 
  • #3
Without words, yes we would think in terms of feelings, mental pictures, sounds etc. We think in words mostly now because they are the most convenient abstract medium to use. Since words are generally just a shorthand way or representing some previous experience, its easier to think the word, than it is to think the experience.

AS such, out brain can throw words around willy nilly.
 
  • #4
It would probably interest you, The Grimmus, to know that Daniel Dennett's theory of consciousness doesn't allow for a fully developed consciousness, separate from one that contains some form of "language". It is the primitive languages that helped the human mind evolve many of it's current conscious abilities.
 
  • #5
Originally posted by Another God
Since words are generally just a shorthand way or representing some previous experience, its easier to think the word, than it is to think the experience.

I seem to recall recently hearing about an autistic(?) woman who claims to think in pictures rather than words. She claimed she had to replay scenes (past experiences) in her head when figuring out how to deal with new situations.

Not sure how much credibility that claim has (I can't quite imagine how that would work).

As for animals, let's not forget instinct (hard-wired responses to external stimuli). The degree to which instinct vs. volition plays in each species (including human) behavior is an interesting subject...which I know little about. :smile:
 
  • #6
This is a good question. For many years scientists had wondered why it was that the Neanderthal who was physically stronger and had a larger brain than the Homo Erectus was the species of the two that became extinct. Eventually, they came to the conclusion that it was due to the fact that the Neanderthal did not have the ability to verbalize that the Homo Erectus did. Essentially, they believe that the lack of ability to talk limited the level of absract thought that the Neanderthal was able to attain; thus, giving the Homo Erectus the evolutionary advantage for dominating that eco-system.

However, I recently watched a show on the Discovery Channel in which a current theory says that the Neanderthal inter-breeded with he Homo Erectus and eventually faded out through. Many archeologists are suggesting that Europeans are actually part Neanderthal. However, this is a very touchy issue. It is not benefical for the development of our society to focus on the genetic differences between different ethnic groups. So, try not to think about these last statements too much.

eNtRopY
 
  • #7
Originally posted by eNtRopY
However, this is a very touchy issue. It is not benefical for the development of our society to focus on the genetic differences between different ethnic groups. So, try not to think about these last statements too much.
That really annoys me. I very much dislike it when emotional crap, and personal issues within society get in the way of meaningful research. I don't care if society has issues with discussing ethnic groupings, if we are trying to understand something objective through science, then let it happen...let science enquire, let us find the answer, and let the answer be true. If europeans are half neanderthal, so what? Does it really change anything?

grrrr at the stupidity of people.
 
  • #8
Another God, I couldn't agree with you more.

Here's an article on the hapmap, which looks like being the new battleground on these issues: http://www.gnxp.com/MT2/archives/000789.html
 
  • #9
Originally posted by The Grimmus
When we think we think using words for the most part maybe with an imgae or two for color but mostly we think in words. How dose one go about thinking without a language like an infiante or another anmial. is problem solving inhibted ?

It is possible, using meditation and meditative techniques, to get into a state of consciousness where words are not part of your thoughts. It's a tenious state, lost easily.
 

1. What does it mean to think without language?

Thinking without language refers to the ability to problem solve and make decisions without relying on spoken or written words. It involves using visual, spatial, and abstract reasoning skills to solve problems and make decisions.

2. How is language related to problem solving?

Language is often used as a tool for problem solving, as it allows us to communicate our thoughts and ideas and collaborate with others. However, research has shown that individuals can also solve problems without using language, through the use of mental imagery and other cognitive processes.

3. Can anyone think without language?

While language is a fundamental aspect of human cognition, research has shown that individuals who lack language abilities, such as those who are deaf or have language impairments, are still able to think and problem solve using other cognitive processes.

4. How does thinking without language affect problem solving abilities?

Thinking without language can have both positive and negative effects on problem solving abilities. On one hand, it allows for more creative and abstract thinking, as individuals are not limited by the constraints of language. On the other hand, it can make communication and collaboration more difficult, as thoughts and ideas may be harder to convey without language.

5. Can thinking without language be learned or trained?

While some individuals may naturally have stronger abilities in thinking without language, research has shown that it can also be learned and trained. This can be done through activities such as visual puzzles, imagination exercises, and other cognitive tasks that promote the use of mental imagery and abstract reasoning.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
804
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
7
Views
947
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
9
Views
243
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
6
Views
406
  • Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
4
Replies
112
Views
5K
Back
Top