This equation, there must be something wrong with it.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Psinter
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the use of the term "radius" in the context of bar magnets, which are typically rectangular rather than circular. The original poster questions why "radius" is used when it seems geometrically exclusive to circles and spheres. A clarification is provided that the term "R" refers to the radius of the cross-section of cylindrical bar magnets, which aligns with the description in the Wikipedia article. This highlights the importance of understanding the context in which terms are used in scientific discussions. The matter is resolved with the realization that the terminology is appropriate for cylindrical shapes.
Psinter
Messages
278
Reaction score
787
This question is out of curiosity. I'm not making anything with magnets, it just called my attention after spending hours clicking link after link in Wikipedia and reading stuff after stuff. I don't even remember how I got here anymore, I was reading electrostatic forces between organic molecules, but everything was connected one way or the other.

Anyway, this equation, it says for Bar magnets. As far as I'm concerned, a bar magnet is not circular or has any geometrical similarities with circles or spheres. It's rectangular.

Then, why does it has an R for radius. Isn't "radius" supposed to be a geometrical exclusive property of circles, spheres and other geometric figures containing one of those two?

I honestly think there must be something wrong with it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Psinter said:
it says for Bar magnets

That's what it says in the subtitle, description says something slightly different. Reread it and it should become clear what R means.
 
The Bar Magnet section in the wiki link mentions, "The force between two identical cylindrical bar magnets placed end to end..."

R would be measured (edit: relative to the cross-section) of cylindrical magnet..
 
Last edited:
I so over-read that part. Case closed then. :)
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top