- #1

- 18

- 0

I tried using all kinds of trigonometric identities, but they never seemed to make it easier. Any suggestions on what identities to use, or how to approach this? Thanks

- Thread starter jmf322
- Start date

- #1

- 18

- 0

I tried using all kinds of trigonometric identities, but they never seemed to make it easier. Any suggestions on what identities to use, or how to approach this? Thanks

- #2

lurflurf

Homework Helper

- 2,432

- 132

sin(x)^2=(1-cos(2x))/2jmf322 said:

I tried using all kinds of trigonometric identities, but they never seemed to make it easier. Any suggestions on what identities to use, or how to approach this? Thanks

- #3

- 13,002

- 552

Daniel.

- #4

- 208

- 0

int of sin ^2 (x) dx = 1/2 x - 1/4 sin 2x + c

- #5

- 789

- 4

You're not supposed to **give away ** the answer... tsk tsk

- #6

- 24

- 0

- #7

- 789

- 4

I'm fairly sure that the second interpretation cannot be integrated by parts. As Daniel said, it requires the Fresnel integral, which integrals.com confirmed.

[tex]S_1(x) = \sqrt{\frac{{2}}{{\pi}}}\int_{0}^{t}\sin{x^2}dx[/tex]

I believe this is the one.

[tex]S_1(x) = \sqrt{\frac{{2}}{{\pi}}}\int_{0}^{t}\sin{x^2}dx[/tex]

I believe this is the one.

Last edited:

- #8

- 970

- 3

Is this methodology correct?

[tex]\sin^2 x = \frac{1 - \cos (2x)}{2}[/tex]

[tex]\int \sin^2 x \; dx = \int \frac{1 - \cos (2x)}{2} dx = \int \frac{1}{2} dx - \int \frac{\cos (2x)}{2} dx[/tex]

[tex]\int \frac{1}{2} dx - \int \frac{\cos (2x)}{2} dx = \frac{1}{2} \int dx - \frac{1}{2} \int \cos (2x) dx[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{2} \int dx - \frac{1}{2} \int \cos (2x) dx = \frac{1}{2} \left( \int dx - \int \cos (2x) dx \right)[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{2} \left( \int dx - \int \cos (2x) dx \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left( x - \frac{\sin (2x)}{2} \right) + C[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{2} \left( x - \frac{\sin (2x)}{2} \right) + C = \frac{x}{2} - \frac{\sin (2x)}{4} + C[/tex]

[tex]\boxed{\int \sin^2 x \; dx = \frac{x}{2} - \frac{\sin (2x)}{4} + C}[/tex]

Last edited:

- #9

- 13,002

- 552

You should always insert the additive constant in an indefinite integral.

Daniel.

Daniel.

- #10

- 789

- 4

- #11

mathwonk

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 11,041

- 1,232

try parts. thats my favorite way.

- #12

- 970

- 3

Mathematica Fresnel Integral definition:

[tex]S(z) = \int_0^z \sin \left( \frac{\pi t^2}{2} \right) dt[/tex]

[tex]\int \sin (x^2) dx = \sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}} \int_0^t \sin (x^2) dx[/tex]

integrals.wolfram.com solution:

[tex]\boxed{\int \sin (x^2) \; dx = \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2}} \cdot \text{FresnelS} \left[ \sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}} x \right]}[/tex]

Is this methodology correct? and what intermediate steps are missing?

What is the integrals.wolfram.com mathematical solution written in symbolic form?

Reference:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=676949&postcount=8

http://integrals.wolfram.com/

Last edited:

- #13

mathwonk

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 11,041

- 1,232

for the integral sin^2(x) parts gives

int(sin^2(x)dx) = -cos(x)sin(x) + int(cos^2(x)dx)

= -cos(x)sin(x) + int(1 - sin^2(x)dx)

so 2 int(sin^2(x)dx) = x - cos(x) sin(x) +constant.

this way you do not need to have any tricky formulas at hand like

sin2 = (1/2)(1-cos(2x)), and the answer comes slightly simpler too.

sin(x^2) on the other hand is no easier than the famous e^(x^2).

intuition should suggest (by the product rule) that most functions of form

f(g(x)) that cannot be expanded or simplified are not going to occur as elementary derivatives.

with a bit of work one can do sqrt(1+x^2) but only because the substitution x = tan(u) simplifies it.

one cannot do sqrt(1+x^4) this way though. :rofl:

int(sin^2(x)dx) = -cos(x)sin(x) + int(cos^2(x)dx)

= -cos(x)sin(x) + int(1 - sin^2(x)dx)

so 2 int(sin^2(x)dx) = x - cos(x) sin(x) +constant.

this way you do not need to have any tricky formulas at hand like

sin2 = (1/2)(1-cos(2x)), and the answer comes slightly simpler too.

sin(x^2) on the other hand is no easier than the famous e^(x^2).

intuition should suggest (by the product rule) that most functions of form

f(g(x)) that cannot be expanded or simplified are not going to occur as elementary derivatives.

with a bit of work one can do sqrt(1+x^2) but only because the substitution x = tan(u) simplifies it.

one cannot do sqrt(1+x^4) this way though. :rofl:

Last edited:

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 15

- Views
- 3K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 1K