Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

This relativistic kinetic energy equation makes no sense to me

  1. Apr 14, 2004 #1

    JJ

    User Avatar

    This "relativistic kinetic energy" equation makes no sense to me

    Presently, I'm reading an e-book I found on the internet titled "Relativity: The Special and General Theory", which may or may not have been written by Albert Einstein. Here's the part which has me in deep patatoes:

    The author then mentions developing the equation into a series. I just can't understand how the second equation can represent kinetic energy.

    Also, what's the difference between an equation and formula?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 14, 2004 #2

    Tom Mattson

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Einstein did write it.

    Right. Express K as:

    K=gmc2-mc2, then expand g in powers of v/c. The leading term in the expansion will be mc2, which will cancel with the -mc2 in the expression for K. The surviving leading term will be (1/2)mv2.

    Do the expansion, and you'll see it.

    Both have an = sign, so none that I can see.
     
  4. Apr 14, 2004 #3

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    binomial expansion

    Keep reading and studying and it will start to make sense. :smile:

    By using the binomial theorem, one can show that for normal, non-relativistic speeds--where v/c is small--that expression for relativistic KE is equivalent to the ordinary definition of 1/2mV2. (That's what they mean by writing the equation as a series.) Here's a site that works it out:
    http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/releng.html#c6

    So, the expression is not that strange after all.

    Note: Oops... Tom beat me to it!
     
  5. Apr 14, 2004 #4

    JJ

    User Avatar

    Well, I've never learned series, so that's why it flew over my head.
     
  6. Apr 14, 2004 #5

    JJ

    User Avatar

    So the kinetic energy of an object would be the second equation minus mc^2? It gives good results when I test it. My calculator has a habit of rounding off numbers, how can i fix it?
     
  7. Apr 14, 2004 #6

    turin

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    It removes the rest energy, so, whatever is left over must be kinetic.




    An equation relates two mathematical objects by declaring that they have the same value. It may or may not impose subordination of one object to another. A formula is a mathematical machine from which you put in your knowns to get a meaningful result. Subordination of the result is implied.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: This relativistic kinetic energy equation makes no sense to me
Loading...