Thorny Newtonian motion of a spaceship

  • Thread starter LiquidPenguin
  • Start date
  • #1
LiquidPenguin
Hi, I am programming a game that involves controlling spaceships with a top-down 2d dimensional view. I want this game to have as realistic a physics model as possible. The idea is that you select a ship and then click on a destination. The ship then turns to an appropriate heading (turning is also acceleration/velocity based movement), turns on the thrusters to accelerate, at some point turns off the thrusters and begins decelerating through retrorockets, and then, when decel is complete, comes to a complete stop at the clicked location.

Now, the problem really isn't that hard unless the ship is already moving when you select a destination. In THAT case it becomes (to me) a hellish convolution of time-based variables. You have to correct for the initial velocity that is normal to the path towards the target by angling the ship slightly in the opposite direction. But, even if you can calculate that adjusted heading, while you are rotating the ship to that angle your position has changed because of your initial velocity, and the angle is all wrong.

Also very thorny is calculating the point at which, after accelerating, you should begin decelerating. All velocity has to be cancelled by the end of the deceleration. Because the ship's retrorockets are mounted opposite the thrusters, the deceleration vector will always be the inverse of the acceleration vector, multiplied by a constant that is the ratio of deceleration over acceleration. Which, I think, means that all of the initial velocity that is normal to the path of flight must be cancelled by the end of the acceleration phase (otherwise the decel phase would increase this velocity, throwing us off course). But doesn't that mean that it will be necessary to rotate the ship during the accel phase so that, by the beginning of decel, the ship is facing directly towards the target destination (though it began accel at a slightly skewed angle to compensate for normal velocity)? Again, the velocity at the destination must be zero in all directions.

The acceleration components will be changing by the sin and cos of the heading... which makes the equations more and more complicated. Should I be employing calculus here? How can I calculate the point at which to begin decelerating? I've made many many many equations trying to get that, but they all seem to be dependent on some other factor (such as the time of the accel burn plus the decel burn) that is in reality dependent on the very result I'm trying to find. Let me summarize what constants are known to the program (I don't know what the convention is for variable names, so please excuse my mistakes in that regard):

Dx, Dy: Destination position
Sx, Sy: Start Position
V0x, V0y: Initial Velocity Components
Theta: Ship's heading
a: max magnitude of ship's acceleration
r: ratio of deceleration rate / acceleration rate
V0r: Initial rotational velocity
Ra: Max rotational acceleration (deceleration is the same)

So since the "start location" is actually changing over time due to the initial velocity (Sx(t)=Sxi+V0x*t), the displacement that will get us to our destination is also changing. Arg.

One big thing that I am not sure of is whether to calculate all the vectors in frame of reference of the standard axes or the frame of reference of the direct line to the destination. For instance, do I look at the initial velocity as V0 in the x and y directions, or velocities normal and parallel to the desired direction? I've tried both ways, and I only run into either dead ends or end up right where I started. Obviously, the problem is not intractable, I mean they must have done the same problem in 3 dimensions and accounting for gravity and a million other factors for the apollo missions. But it's certainly causing me severe pain. Any insights anyone can provide, or mistakes in my logic, would be gratefully appreciated. Thanks for reading.

-Geoff
 

Answers and Replies

Related Threads on Thorny Newtonian motion of a spaceship

  • Last Post
Replies
23
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
237
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
453
Replies
11
Views
795
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
765
Top