Three questions on Montonen-Olive duality

  • Thread starter metroplex021
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Duality
In summary, we discussed the beta functions of the electric and magnetic couplings, the choice of limit in the classical regime, and the importance of studying the classical limit in understanding the behavior of a quantum field theory.
  • #1
metroplex021
151
0
Hi folks -- I have three questions on Montonen-Olive duality. This duality switches the electric and magnetic couplings, where these couplings are related by the Dirac quantization condition

eg = 2[itex]\hbar\pi[/itex]n

Here e is the electric charge and g the magnetic (monopole) charge.

1. First of all, do these couplings both 'run' in the theory (thus have their own, non-zero beta function)? If so, does that mean that there are energy regimes in which e is small and g large, and other regimes where g is small and e large?

2. It is said that, in one way of taking the classical limit, magnetically charged particles arise as composite particles while the electrically charged particles are fundamental, and yet in another way of taking the limit it's the electrically charged particles that are composite and the magnetic monopoles that are now elementary. In the first case, it's when e is taken to go to zero while g is held fixed as h tends to zero, and in the other case it is g that goes to zero while e is held fixed in the classical limit. Do any principles govern which of these limits is the right one to take? That is, do any facts about the physics of the situation inform you that it's g (or e) that should be held fixed in the h-> 0 limit?

3. Finally, why do we look at particle content in the classical limit anyway? Isn't the spectrum of a quantum field theory an intrinsic property of it, and moreover one that can be assigned in regimes of finite h?

Any help on any of these questions would be very much appreciated!

metroplex
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
, thank you for your questions on Montonen-Olive duality. This duality is a very interesting topic in particle physics and has been studied extensively by many scientists.

To answer your first question, yes, both the electric and magnetic couplings have their own beta functions in the theory. This means that they can both change as the energy scale of the system changes. In some regimes, the electric coupling may be small while the magnetic coupling is large, and vice versa. This is due to the fact that the two couplings are related by the Dirac quantization condition, and therefore their values can change in different energy regimes.

As for your second question, the choice of which limit to take (e or g held fixed in the classical limit) is not determined by any specific principles. It is a matter of convenience and depends on the specific situation being studied. In some cases, it may be more useful to hold g fixed while taking the classical limit, while in others it may be more useful to hold e fixed. This choice is usually made based on the physics being studied and the desired outcome.

Finally, regarding your third question, it is true that the spectrum of a quantum field theory is an intrinsic property that can be assigned in regimes of finite h. However, studying the particle content in the classical limit can give us important insights into the behavior of the theory at high energies. It can also help us understand the relationship between different particles and their interactions. Therefore, studying the classical limit can provide valuable information about the quantum field theory as a whole.

I hope this helps answer your questions about Montonen-Olive duality. Please let me know if you have any further inquiries.
 

1. What is Montonen-Olive duality?

Montonen-Olive duality, also known as electric-magnetic duality or S-duality, is a concept in theoretical physics that relates the properties of two different quantum field theories through a mathematical transformation. This duality was first proposed by physicists Claus Montonen and David Olive in 1977.

2. How does Montonen-Olive duality work?

Montonen-Olive duality relates two different theories, one describing particles that carry electric charge and the other describing particles that carry magnetic charge. The duality transformation changes the coupling constant of one theory into that of the other, and vice versa. This means that the theories are equivalent in terms of their physical predictions, but the particles and their interactions are described differently in each theory.

3. What is the significance of Montonen-Olive duality?

The significance of Montonen-Olive duality is that it provides a deeper understanding of the underlying structure of quantum field theories. It also has important implications in areas such as string theory, where it has been used to solve problems that were previously unsolvable. Additionally, the duality has been observed in various physical systems, providing evidence for its validity.

4. How is Montonen-Olive duality related to supersymmetry?

Montonen-Olive duality is closely related to supersymmetry, which is a theoretical framework that describes a relationship between particles with different spin. S-duality is a type of supersymmetry that relates particles with different charges, such as electric and magnetic charges. This connection has allowed physicists to make progress in understanding both duality and supersymmetry.

5. What are some applications of Montonen-Olive duality?

Montonen-Olive duality has been applied in various areas of theoretical physics, including string theory, quantum field theory, and gauge theory. It has also been used to study the properties of black holes and to make predictions about the behavior of particles in high-energy collisions. Additionally, the duality has been used to solve mathematical problems and to better understand the structure of physical theories.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
996
Replies
1
Views
417
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
1
Views
645
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
2
Replies
35
Views
7K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
4K
Back
Top