I have a question about the gravitational model used to describe tides:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Is it correct to simplyaddthe tide potentials respectively due to earth and sun as most people do? (see for instance a good example of this approach in Eq 9 of: http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/0701/0701301v1.pdf).

The superposition principle, at first, almost convinced me not to go further... when I came across this 1976 paper: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1977SvAL....3...96A,

which is then contradicted in 1981 by:

http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu//full/1981SvAL....7..281S/0000282.000.html.

Avsyuk's reasoning is appealing:

to calculate the acceleration a0 of M0 in the inertial coordinate system of the three bodies he adds the acceleration a1 of M0 in the mobile system of the earth-moon barycenter to the acceleration a2 of this barycenter with respect to the earth-moon-sun reference system.

Sitnik and Khlystov have the same expression for a2 (Eq. 6) but they differ for a1. I have a hard time to understand their second term in (8). What is M0 acceleration in the mobile refrerence frame of the earth-moon barycenter? Is it Sitnik and Khlystov's Eq.8 or F3/M0 as Avsyuk wants or, as I would prefer, (F1+F3)/M0?

Does someone would care to ponder a bit on these questions? Thanks!

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Tide potential

Loading...

Similar Threads - Tide potential | Date |
---|---|

I Do Solar Tides affect Earth's Orbit? | Nov 30, 2017 |

I Tides on a nearly tidally locked planet | Apr 9, 2017 |

B If an object runs an infinite distance in universe...? | Nov 19, 2016 |

B Semidiurnal tide confusion | Jul 4, 2016 |

How would Earth be affected by an additional smaller moon? | Jan 31, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**