Time & Acceleration: A Relativity Puzzle

In summary, the concept of time dilation arises from the fact that one body is in motion while the other is stationary. In reality, both observers see the other as having slower time, but it ultimately depends on who returns to whose frame of reference. This is because time dilation is caused by acceleration, not just the magnitude of gravitational force. Additionally, the potential energy of a body does not determine its motion, as stillness and acceleration are relative terms and depend on the frame of reference.
  • #1
mee
213
1
Why is time relative when an accelerating body could be seen as accelerating away from another body at exactly the same speed as the body from which one is accelerating away from is speeding away from the first body? I. e. the bodies could be seen as accelerating away from each other at the same rate, increasing at whatever rate equally. Is it the increased "gravity" on the ship which would cause a distortion? If the propulsive device is seen as a bomb pushing equally on all sides, that just happens to be attatched to the ship, pressing on ship and planetary influence equally, why does the time not change equally for both bodies? Maybe silly I know. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
this question has been asked on this forum like 1 million times. The reason for this is simple. It's because one body is in motion, and one body is not. The body which accelerates knows that it is in morion, and time distarts for that body, but the body which does not feel an acceleration does not change, time is the same as usual for him. In actuallity, both observers see the other as having slower time. But who is right depends on who rejoins who's referance frame.
 
  • #3
Nenad said:
this question has been asked on this forum like 1 million times. The reason for this is simple. It's because one body is in motion, and one body is not. The body which accelerates knows that it is in morion, and time distarts for that body, but the body which does not feel an acceleration does not change, time is the same as usual for him. In actuallity, both observers see the other as having slower time. But who is right depends on who rejoins who's referance frame.

But it seems to me that both bodies could be seen to be in motion if all motion is relative. That it is merely a useful habit we are into see it otherwise. I'm not sure you have cleared this up. Not to me anyways. :) Thanks though.
 
  • #4
"For one, it isn't the magnitude of gravitational force that causes time dilation, but the difference in gravitational potential"

Found this on another post. Thought it might have something to do with this.
 
  • #5
mee said:
But it seems to me that both bodies could be seen to be in motion if all motion is relative. That it is merely a useful habit we are into see it otherwise. I'm not sure you have cleared this up. Not to me anyways. :) Thanks though.

Both bodies are seen to be in motion by both observers. But one of the is wrong. The on in morion is wrong because he is the one in motion and the stationary body is not. The way a time knows who is in motion or not is through acceleration. One of bodies will need to accelerate in order to get to a high speed. Do you see what I mean. If both of them are going at high speeds, than you would have to dilate both their times.
It all depends on which observer returns to whos frame. If the traveling observer is to return to the stationary frame, then the traveling observers notion that he was stationary is wrong, and his assumptions are wrong. But if the stationary observer suddenly speeds up and joins the oberver in motion, then the motion observer is right. What I mean by right time. Both the traveller and the stationary guy will see themselves as having their time pass by more quickly, but in fact, the traveler is wrong and it his his time which is passing by slower. I am sorry if I confused you, but its not easy to explain. If you have more questions, please ask.
 
  • #6
Nenad said:
Both bodies are seen to be in motion by both observers. But one of the is wrong. The on in morion is wrong because he is the one in motion and the stationary body is not. The way a time knows who is in motion or not is through acceleration. One of bodies will need to accelerate in order to get to a high speed. Do you see what I mean. If both of them are going at high speeds, than you would have to dilate both their times.
It all depends on which observer returns to whos frame. If the traveling observer is to return to the stationary frame, then the traveling observers notion that he was stationary is wrong, and his assumptions are wrong. But if the stationary observer suddenly speeds up and joins the oberver in motion, then the motion observer is right. What I mean by right time. Both the traveller and the stationary guy will see themselves as having their time pass by more quickly, but in fact, the traveler is wrong and it his his time which is passing by slower. I am sorry if I confused you, but its not easy to explain. If you have more questions, please ask.


It seems to me that the energy from an asteroid crashing into the Earth at high speed and of the Earth crashing into the asteroid at the same high speed would be the same. The potential energy of both the Earth and the spaceship go up equally as the spaceships propulsion accelerates it? As potential energy is a relative term and stillness is only in relationship to another object, usually the center of mass is seen as the still point or where the observer is or againts an apparently stable reference frame, not nonmoving but apparently stable. Acceleration is seen as moving because of what we are used to. Not because it is absolute? I'm kindof trying to say something like this. A similar analogy would be a moving car. The tires wheels could be seen as moving the Earth and the rest of the universe, while the car remains still, moving the rest of the universe until it is the place one wishes to go. actually, the force is equal on both the car and the rest of the universe and both are moving away from each other equally. Fun to think about for me anyway. Thanks for your interest. :)
 
  • #7
If you draw a space-time diagram, the obsever that accelerates will always have traveled down two sides of a triangle.

The observer that does not accelrate will move in a straight line.

In Euclidean geometry, the person who travels down two sides of a triangle will always travel a longer distance.

In relativity, the person who travels down two sides of a triangle will always have the least amount of time on his clock.

This difference arises because the sign of the metric for time is the opposite for that of space (if that makes sense, sorry if it's too technical).

The acceleration doesn't directly determine the time difference. The length of the sides of the triangle (i.e the length of the trip) is much more critical. The time dilation factor is also important. The actual acceleration used is usually not a factor unless the trip is very short.
 
  • #8
mee said:
If the propulsive device is seen as a bomb pushing equally on all sides, that just happens to be attatched to the ship, pressing on ship and planetary influence equally, why does the time not change equally for both bodies? Maybe silly I know. :)
Well, if you apply the same force to a rocket ship and a planet, the rocket ship is still going to accelerate a lot faster.
 
  • #9
russ_watters said:
Well, if you apply the same force to a rocket ship and a planet, the rocket ship is still going to accelerate a lot faster.

So you are saying that acceleration and not relative speed is the factor?
 
  • #10
relative speed is the factior, but acceleration tells someone who is in relative motion and who isnt.
 
  • #11
Nenad said:
relative speed is the factior, but acceleration tells someone who is in relative motion and who isnt.

Thanks for your help! So is it pressure created by acceleration perhaps that causes the effect? Also, could it be theoretically sound that the accelerating object could be seen as a decelerating object, with the rest of the universe seen as remaining at a fixed speed? Would the properties of either situation be the same?
 
  • #12
mee said:
Also, could it be theoretically sound that the accelerating object could be seen as a decelerating object, with the rest of the universe seen as remaining at a fixed speed? Would the properties of either situation be the same?

Im not shure what you mean? Can you rephrase your question.
 
  • #13
mee said:
Thanks for your help! So is it pressure created by acceleration perhaps that causes the effect? Also, could it be theoretically sound that the accelerating object could be seen as a decelerating object, with the rest of the universe seen as remaining at a fixed speed? Would the properties of either situation be the same?

Acceleration is what makes world-lines bend. But what actually causes the difference in clock readings is that one world line is straight, while another world-line is bent. Bending the world-line of one observer is necessary to cause a difference in clock readings, but the acceleration is like the radius of curvature of the bend - it's just not very important. The angle of the bend (velocity) and the length of the paths traveled are the really important variables.
 
  • #14
The easiest way to illustarte this is to draw a simple displacemnt/time graph:

a) for an object with constant velocity

b) for an acelarting object
 
  • #15
pervect said:
Acceleration is what makes world-lines bend. But what actually causes the difference in clock readings is that one world line is straight, while another world-line is bent. Bending the world-line of one observer is necessary to cause a difference in clock readings, but the acceleration is like the radius of curvature of the bend - it's just not very important. The angle of the bend (velocity) and the length of the paths traveled are the really important variables.

Okay, let's say one is leaving the galaxy. The galaxy appears to be moving quite fast in a certain direction. Let's say a ship decelerates to the point to where it is nolonger moving with the galaxy. To the observers in the galaxy, the ship is now moving (accelerating apparently) away from them. What would the time differential be? The ship appeared to be accelerating away, but from another point of view, it could be seen to be decelerating?
 
  • #16
mee said:
Okay, let's say one is leaving the galaxy. The galaxy appears to be moving quite fast in a certain direction. Let's say a ship decelerates to the point to where it is nolonger moving with the galaxy. To the observers in the galaxy, the ship is now moving (accelerating apparently) away from them. What would the time differential be? The ship appeared to be accelerating away, but from another point of view, it could be seen to be decelerating?


Also, if there were a white light on the ship, what would the shift in frequency beto someone on a planet in the galaxy?
 
  • #17
mee said:
Okay, let's say one is leaving the galaxy. The galaxy appears to be moving quite fast in a certain direction. Let's say a ship decelerates to the point to where it is nolonger moving with the galaxy. To the observers in the galaxy, the ship is now moving (accelerating apparently) away from them. What would the time differential be? The ship appeared to be accelerating away, but from another point of view, it could be seen to be decelerating?

in this case, the accelerating ships time would dilate in the beginning, when he is accelerationg away from the galaxy, but once he sdecelerates and the galaxy is moving away from him, then the galaxys time which dilates. In this case, both the galaxy and the rocket ship's time dilate, but at different times.
 
  • #18
mee said:
Also, if there were a white light on the ship, what would the shift in frequency beto someone on a planet in the galaxy?

there would be no redshft on the light. The two types of redsift in the universe are caused by gravciataion and the rapid expansion of space, not by the acceleleration of bodies from each other.
 
  • #19
Nenad said:
in this case, the accelerating ships time would dilate in the beginning, when he is accelerationg away from the galaxy, but once he sdecelerates and the galaxy is moving away from him, then the galaxys time which dilates. In this case, both the galaxy and the rocket ship's time dilate, but at different times.

Im not sure you understand. He is never accelerating away from the galaxy, he is decelerating away from the galaxy. until he is moving slower than it. Thanks for your help.
 
  • #20
I'm going to step in here and clear something up. Nenad's explanation of what is happening in this situation is not correct. You cannot say that the ship or galaxy is the one that is "truely" moving at any moment. This would imply that there was a preferred frame of reference, one considered at absolute rest, by which you could measure this movement. Relativity denies the existence of such a reference frame.

The time dilations seen by either as affecting the other are equally real.

The reason the ship experiences less time passage depends upon whether you are on the ship or galaxy.

As far as the galaxy is concerned, the ship time slows down due to time dilation.

As far as the ship is concerned, for some periods the galaxy time slows down and for some periods the galaxy time speeds up.

The difference is due to the fact that the while the galaxy remains an inertial frame, the ship does not. The important point is when the ship is accelerating back towards the galaxy.(or decelerating to rest with respect to the galaxy at the far point of separation.) This is the period when the ship will see the galaxy time as running very fast. This is due to the way Relativity deals with measurements made from an accelerated frame. This 'time running fast' period more than compensates for the time when the ship sees the galaxy time as running slow.

IOW, while observers on both the ship and galaxy will agree as to how much time has elapsed for both at the end of the trip, they will not agree as to how this situation came about, and neither's interpretation of events is more vlaid than the other.
 
  • #21
Janus said:
I'm going to step in here and clear something up. Nenad's explanation of what is happening in this situation is not correct. You cannot say that the ship or galaxy is the one that is "truely" moving at any moment. This would imply that there was a preferred frame of reference, one considered at absolute rest, by which you could measure this movement. Relativity denies the existence of such a reference frame.

The time dilations seen by either as affecting the other are equally real.

The reason the ship experiences less time passage depends upon whether you are on the ship or galaxy.

As far as the galaxy is concerned, the ship time slows down due to time dilation.

As far as the ship is concerned, for some periods the galaxy time slows down and for some periods the galaxy time speeds up.

The difference is due to the fact that the while the galaxy remains an inertial frame, the ship does not. The important point is when the ship is accelerating back towards the galaxy.(or decelerating to rest with respect to the galaxy at the far point of separation.) This is the period when the ship will see the galaxy time as running very fast. This is due to the way Relativity deals with measurements made from an accelerated frame. This 'time running fast' period more than compensates for the time when the ship sees the galaxy time as running slow.

IOW, while observers on both the ship and galaxy will agree as to how much time has elapsed for both at the end of the trip, they will not agree as to how this situation came about, and neither's interpretation of events is more vlaid than the other.


Are you saying that the galaxies are relatively still while the space between them increases? If I could take a physics or cosmology class I would. :) Thanks for your help.
 
  • #22
mee said:
Okay, let's say one is leaving the galaxy. The galaxy appears to be moving quite fast in a certain direction. Let's say a ship decelerates to the point to where it is nolonger moving with the galaxy. To the observers in the galaxy, the ship is now moving (accelerating apparently) away from them. What would the time differential be? The ship appeared to be accelerating away, but from another point of view, it could be seen to be decelerating?

I was thinking of taking another crack at this, but I think it would overall be best just to refer mee to the sci.physics.faq on the twin paradox

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/TwinParadox/twin_paradox.html

It's certainly easier, at any rate :-)

I'm generally fond of the space-time diagram explanation, as I've said several times before, but it doesn't seem to be "clicking" for mee.

No problem, there are _lots_ of different appraoches to the twin "paradox"

Perhaps, if the space-time diagram explanation doesn't "click", the "doppler" explanation might work. (That's my next favorite explanation). This explanation concentrates on what each observer actually *sees* physically.

Note that there is no shortage of appraoches to the twin "paradox", there's even a meta-apology about "too many explanations" in the FAQ.
 
  • #23
pervect said:
I was thinking of taking another crack at this, but I think it would overall be best just to refer mee to the sci.physics.faq on the twin paradox

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/TwinParadox/twin_paradox.html

It's certainly easier, at any rate :-)

I'm generally fond of the space-time diagram explanation, as I've said several times before, but it doesn't seem to be "clicking" for mee.

No problem, there are _lots_ of different appraoches to the twin "paradox"

Perhaps, if the space-time diagram explanation doesn't "click", the "doppler" explanation might work. (That's my next favorite explanation). This explanation concentrates on what each observer actually *sees* physically.

Note that there is no shortage of appraoches to the twin "paradox", there's even a meta-apology about "too many explanations" in the FAQ.


I am quite familiar with the twin paradox. I was just wondering what would happen in this new twist on it. Thank you for your help.
 
  • #24
mee said:
I am quite familiar with the twin paradox. I was just wondering what would happen in this new twist on it. Thank you for your help.

OK, a few last words, for what they're worth. Trying to work out "when" the time differential occurs is a futile effort. Think of time as an interval, that you measure with a clock. Like a ruler, you have to specify the exact path you traverse in order to measure it.

The main point is very simple - if two clocks start out at the same point in space-time, and are syncrhonized there, and then take different paths through space-time, when the re-unite they will no longer in general be synchronized.
 
  • #25
pervect said:
I was thinking of taking another crack at this, but I think it would overall be best just to refer mee to the sci.physics.faq on the twin paradox

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/TwinParadox/twin_paradox.html

It's certainly easier, at any rate :-)

I'm generally fond of the space-time diagram explanation, as I've said several times before, but it doesn't seem to be "clicking" for mee.

No problem, there are _lots_ of different appraoches to the twin "paradox"

Perhaps, if the space-time diagram explanation doesn't "click", the "doppler" explanation might work. (That's my next favorite explanation). This explanation concentrates on what each observer actually *sees* physically.

Note that there is no shortage of appraoches to the twin "paradox", there's even a meta-apology about "too many explanations" in the FAQ.


It doesn't click because I don't know how to draw a space time diagram yet.
 
  • #26
mee said:
It doesn't click because I don't know how to draw a space time diagram yet.

You probably do, but just don't know it yet. You take a graph, label one axis "distance", another axis "time", and you draw a curve on it which plots the distance vs the time.
 

1. What is the theory of relativity?

The theory of relativity, developed by Albert Einstein in the early 20th century, is a fundamental principle in physics that explains the relationships between space and time. It consists of two main theories: the special theory of relativity and the general theory of relativity. The special theory of relativity deals with objects moving at constant speeds, while the general theory of relativity applies to objects that are accelerating or under the influence of gravity.

2. How does time dilation occur in relativity?

Time dilation is a phenomenon that occurs in the special theory of relativity, where time appears to move slower for objects that are moving at high speeds. This is due to the fact that as an object's speed increases, its time frame also expands. This means that time moves slower for an object in motion compared to one at rest. This has been proven through experiments and is a crucial aspect of the theory of relativity.

3. What is the equation for calculating time dilation in relativity?

The equation for calculating time dilation in the special theory of relativity is t' = t/(√1-v²/c²), where t' is the time measured by an observer in motion, t is the time measured by an observer at rest, v is the relative velocity between the two observers, and c is the speed of light. This equation shows that as an object's velocity approaches the speed of light, its time frame expands and time moves slower for that object.

4. How does acceleration affect time in the general theory of relativity?

In the general theory of relativity, acceleration is considered a form of gravity. This means that objects that are accelerating experience time dilation, just like objects in a gravitational field. This is because acceleration and gravity both cause a curvature in spacetime, which affects the way time moves. This is known as gravitational time dilation and has been observed through experiments, such as the famous Hafele-Keating experiment.

5. Can time travel be achieved through relativity?

According to the theory of relativity, time travel is theoretically possible. However, it would require an immense amount of energy and technology that is currently beyond our capabilities. This is because as an object approaches the speed of light, its time frame expands infinitely, theoretically allowing it to travel through time. While this concept is still largely theoretical, it has been explored in science fiction and continues to be a fascinating topic for scientific research and speculation.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
4
Replies
115
Views
5K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
50
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
25
Views
534
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
51
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
85
Views
5K
Replies
35
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
23
Views
969
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top