Understanding Time and Light Slowing: Exploring the Possibilities

  • Thread starter Geekchick
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Light Time
In summary, the article argues that if the fine structure constant (a ratio of constants that governs the speed of light, Planck's constant, and electron charge) varies, then light may look slower than it really is because it takes longer for the light to travel through denser matter. However, the evidence is not yet strong enough to support this theory.
  • #1
Geekchick
77
0
Alright, so my friend and I were looking at articles on light possibly slowing down and he was saying that the article (http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2002/08/07/1028157961167.html) was assuming that the matter between the Earth and the quasars is constant. So his reasoning was what if instead of light traveling slower there is simply more matter between the Earth and the stars now? and since light slows as it moves through matter that's what is causing light to look like its slowing down? but I was thinking that since motion slows time isn't it possible that the light and time are slowing at the same rate so that would cancel his theory, right? Can someone explain this to me. Note that I know next to nothing about physics.

thanks!
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #2
It's not actually about light slowing per se, they presented it that way for simplicity. It's about a change in the "fine structure constant", which is a dimensionless number that is a ratio of several constants including the speed of light, Planck's constant and electron charge. So if the fine structure constant changes, we can say it's the speed of light or Planck's constant or the electron charge or some mixture of them that has changed.

What they measured was also not the speed of light per se. They know that a particular chemical can absorb light of several frequencies. The difference between the frequencies is characteristic of that chemical, and related to the fine structure constant. So in this way they can compare the fine structure constant in stuff far away and "long ago" with the fine structure constant of stuff here and "now".

Although there is some evidence suggesting that the fine structure constant is not constant, the evidence is not (yet?) strong enough to be accepted as "fact".

The fundamental constants and their variation: observational status and theoretical motivations
Jean-Philippe Uzan
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0205340

Variation of the constants in the late and early universe
Jean-Philippe Uzan
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0409424
 
  • #3


I would like to address the topic of time and light slowing down and the possibilities that come with it. First, I would like to clarify that the article mentioned in the question is from 2002 and there have been many advancements and discoveries in the field of physics since then. Therefore, it is important to consider more recent research and studies on this topic.

Now, let's address the question about whether light is slowing down or there is simply more matter between the Earth and the stars. The concept of light slowing down is not a new one and has been studied for many years. It is a well-established fact that light travels at a constant speed in a vacuum, which is approximately 299,792,458 meters per second. This has been proven through numerous experiments and is a fundamental principle in physics.

The idea that light may be slowing down due to more matter between the Earth and the stars is not supported by scientific evidence. In fact, it goes against the basic principles of physics. Light travels through matter at a slower speed than in a vacuum, but this does not affect its overall speed. The amount of matter between the Earth and the stars has been taken into account in various experiments and calculations, and it has not been found to have a significant impact on the speed of light.

Now, let's talk about the relationship between motion, time, and light. It is true that motion can affect the perception of time, as described by Einstein's theory of relativity. However, this does not mean that time and light are slowing down at the same rate. The speed of light is constant, regardless of the observer's frame of reference. This means that even if time appears to be slowing down due to motion, the speed of light remains the same.

In conclusion, the idea of light slowing down or time and light slowing down at the same rate is not supported by scientific evidence. The speed of light is constant, and any perceived changes in time or light are due to other factors such as motion or gravitational effects. I would encourage anyone interested in this topic to continue learning about physics and to stay updated on the latest research and discoveries.
 

1. How does time dilation occur?

Time dilation occurs when an object is moving at a high speed or in a strong gravitational field. This causes time to appear to slow down for the object in motion compared to an observer who is not moving or in a weaker gravitational field.

2. Can time dilation be observed on Earth?

Yes, time dilation can be observed on Earth, but the effects are very small due to the relatively low speeds and weak gravitational fields we experience in our daily lives. Special equipment is needed to measure these effects accurately.

3. How does light slow down?

Light does not actually slow down, but it can appear to slow down when it travels through a medium such as air or water. This is due to the interaction of light with the particles in the medium, causing it to change direction and appear to travel at a slower speed.

4. What are the practical implications of time dilation?

The most significant practical implication of time dilation is for space travel. As objects move at high speeds in space, time dilation can cause significant differences in the aging of astronauts compared to people on Earth. This must be taken into account for accurate navigation and communication.

5. Are there any theories that challenge the concept of time dilation?

There are some alternative theories that challenge the concept of time dilation, such as the Lorentz ether theory and the white hole cosmology theory. However, these theories have not been widely accepted by the scientific community and do not have as much evidence to support them as the theory of relativity.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
760
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
275
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
45
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
660
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
875
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
995
Back
Top