Hi,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Physics books gloss over math. Sometimes it bothers me.

Given a separable function of time and position f = h(x)g(t) then

d / dt of [inte] h(x)g(t)dx = [inte] h(x) dg(t)/dt dx

Where the derivative in the second integral is a partial deriv.

Why the chain rule does not apply is glossed over by the statement that the definite integral of f(x,t) with respect to x results in a new function that is a function of t only. I believe that, but since x can be a function of t I can't see why the chain rule does not apply. Can someone please explain this to me?

To be more specific the book says:

d/dt of [inte] x * psi(x,t)dx = [inte] x * dpsi(x,t)/dt dx

where again the second integral has partial deriv. w.r.t. time t. The '*' above just means times here.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Time derivative of definite integral

Loading...

Similar Threads - derivative definite integral | Date |
---|---|

Directional derivative and gradient definition confusion | Nov 23, 2014 |

Deriving the algebraic definition the dot product | Dec 2, 2012 |

Definition of Curl. Can anyone derive the gradient operator? | Jul 25, 2010 |

Definition of derivative | Aug 13, 2005 |

General definition of a derivative | Jun 20, 2005 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**