Time Dilation: 1.25yr Trip at 2.40x10^8m/s

In summary, an astronaut is traveling at a constant speed of 2.40x10^8 m/s relative to Earth through space. According to timing devices aboard the space vehicle the trip took 1.25 years. how long did the trip last if measured relative to earth
  • #1
pmor@hotmail.
5
0
An astronaut is traveling at a constant speed of 2.40x10^8 m/s relative to Earth through space. according to timing devices aboard the space vehicle the trip took 1.25 years. how long did the trip last if measured relative to earth
HELP PLEASE!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I guess the answer is 2.08333 years.
1.25=x{1-(v/c)^2}^.5
x=2.08333
 
Last edited:
  • #3
hemantc007 said:
I guess the answer is 2.08333 years.
1.25=x{1-(c/v)^2}^.5
x=2.08333

thats right!
but how did you get that?
do you need to convert the velocity?
 
  • #4
pmor@hotmail. said:
thats right!
but how did you get that?
do you need to convert the velocity?

no you don't because , when we apply the formula (v/c)^2 both v and c are in same units i.e m/s...
 
Last edited:
  • #5
hmm I am still not getting the right answer when i plug it into my calculater..
 
  • #6
Set the calculator aside, write it out on paper first.
 
  • #7
see the formula is t1 = t2 * { 1 - (v/c)^2 }^(1/2)
where t1 is time in space shuttle (at 2.4...velocity)
t2 is time measured on Earth
c is velocity of light
v is velocity of space ship
The above formula is time dilation formula ...
now try it again

ya you could do it on paper too, its easy calculation...
 
Last edited:
  • #8
DaveC426913 said:
Set the calculator aside, write it out on paper first.

okay so it would be something like
1.25/ (1-(2.4x10^8)2)^(.5)
which gives me a negative square root
 
  • #9
pmor@hotmail. said:
hmm I am still not getting the right answer when i plug it into my calculater..

The equation should be x= 1.25/{1-(v/c)^2}^(1/2) with (v/c) and not (c/v).

Use v= 2.40x10^8 m/s and c= 2.99792458x10^8 m/s and you should get the right answer.
 
  • #10
pmor@hotmail. said:
okay so it would be something like
1.25/ (1-(2.4x10^8)2)^(.5)
which gives me a negative square root

dude it is not v^2 ...but...it is v^2/c^2...
where c=299792458 m/s and
v is 2.4*10^8 m/s
 
Last edited:
  • #11
okay i got ittt finally
thanks guyyys
 
  • #12
The lesson here, I hope you see, is that, if you rush through the work just to get an answer, you're not paying attention. Setting aside the calculator forces you to ensure that the process leading up to the number at the end is the important part.
 
  • #13
pmor@hotmail.
I am sorry for that mistake i.e replacing c by v...
 

1. How does time dilation work?

Time dilation is a phenomenon in which time passes differently for an object depending on its relative velocity. This means that if an object is moving at a high speed, time will appear to pass slower for it compared to an object that is stationary.

2. What is the formula for time dilation?

The formula for time dilation is t' = t / √(1 - v^2/c^2), where t' is the dilated time, t is the original time, v is the relative velocity, and c is the speed of light.

3. How does the speed of the object affect time dilation?

The speed of the object has a direct impact on time dilation. The faster the object is moving, the more time will appear to slow down for it. This is because the closer the object's velocity is to the speed of light, the greater the effect of time dilation.

4. How much time would pass for the object during a 1.25 year trip at 2.40x10^8m/s?

Based on the formula for time dilation, the dilated time (t') would be approximately 1.30 years. This means that for the object traveling at 2.40x10^8m/s, only 1.30 years would pass, while 1.25 years would pass for a stationary observer.

5. Is time dilation just a theoretical concept or has it been proven?

Time dilation has been proven through numerous experiments and observations, including the famous Hafele-Keating experiment in 1971 and the use of atomic clocks on GPS satellites. It is an important concept in both special and general relativity and is widely accepted in the scientific community.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
25
Views
630
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
65
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
4
Replies
115
Views
5K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
70
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
63
Views
3K
Back
Top