Time Space Physics: 3 Questions for Physics Community

AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses three key questions about the nature of time and space in physics. It asserts that time and space are not functions of each other but are part of a unified concept known as spacetime, described mathematically through the spacetime metric. The conversation emphasizes that physics is fundamentally a testable science, not based on faith, as theories evolve through empirical validation and refinement. Historical shifts in understanding, such as the transition from Newtonian physics to Einstein's relativity, illustrate this progression. Ultimately, the thread concludes that ongoing research in theories like Superstring theory aims to provide more comprehensive explanations, reinforcing the empirical nature of physics.
abbeynewton
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
i have three questions for the physics community
1. is time be a function of space or space be a function of time?
2. can we say that without space and time, there is no physics?
3. why has physics progressed from a fact based science to a "faith" based science?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
1. Neither.
2. Yes.
3. It hasn't.

Are you here to ask questions or to make absurd accusations? You might as well ask "Have you stopped beating your wife?"
 
in answer to 1 and 2, both space and time are combined into one entity spacetime meaning an object is defined by a point in x,y,z,t. The interrelationship is the spacetime metric ds^2 - td^2 to describe distances in spacetime. Its an analogue to the pythagorean formula for distance. x,y,z,t are all independent of one another but objects move within spacetime conform to the spacetime metric limitation from which we get length contraction and time dilation.

Physics is not and has never been faith based. Everything that we understand is testable and when it fails a test we either patch it up or discard it looking for a new and better mathematically described theory. At one time Newtons theory of gravitation described the world but as detailed measurements from experiments differed from Newtons predications we had to replace it with Einsteins relativity to gain a new understanding of things. Someday, Einsteins theory will give way to an even better more inclusive theory.

Scientists exploring Superstring theory or Loop Quantum Gravity are looking for more inclusive theories. They may be fueled by a belief (some might say faith) that they are on the right path but eventually the theory must describe everything that existing theories describe and then something new that we haven't seen that can eventually can be tested to see if its true.
 
And on that note, this pointless thread is closed!

Zz.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
58
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top