Is Time Travel Really Possible or Just a Myth?

In summary, the conversation discusses various theories and ideas about the possibility of time travel. One argument is that if time travel were possible, we would already know about it through people from the future traveling back to the past. However, another idea is that time travel is limited by the ability to disguise and only a select few may have traveled back without interacting with anyone. The concept of time travel also raises issues with free will and the possibility of a predetermined future. The conversation ends with a suggestion that a time machine may only be able to travel back to its first day of creation, similar to how wormholes work.
  • #1
Virii
What do you think of this theory, time travel will never be created because if it was, then people in the future would have come back to the past and we would know about it by now. Unless of course a select few were able to go to the past, and told nor interacted with anyone.

But my idea was that time travel isn't possible, because if it were, we would know about someone who was in the future that traveled back.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Virii said:
But my idea was that time travel isn't possible, because if it were, we would know about someone who was in the future that traveled back.

You mean we'd automatically know if anyone in the future had traveled back to now/sometime in the past? I don't really agree with that. That's just limited by their ability to disguise.

I'd disagree with the above logic, partially. If one could create a wormhole, and travel at high speeds, then the relativistic effects would cause one end to be at a different time than the other. This time machine could never send anyone to before it had been created, and would send people a fixed amount of time back in the past (back 25 years, not back to 1980 for instance). The being-overrun-with-time-travellers logic breaks down for any such a time machine. Personally, I think that's the only kind which would be possible.
 
  • #3
Do a search. There have been lots of threads about time travel. I've personally posted in some of them and I don't feel like repeating in this thread.
 
  • #4
Virii said:
But my idea was that time travel isn't possible, because if it were, we would know about someone who was in the future that traveled back.

Yep, the problem is that if we have had visitors, we may not know it or even be capable of recognizing one... unless you can tell me what a practical time machine looks like and how to detect it.
 
  • #5
I time travel in my delorean. You must go at least 88mph though.
 
  • #6
I know of a time machine that looks like a blue phone booth. :biggrin:
 
  • #7
Ivan Seeking said:
I know of a time machine that looks like a blue phone booth. :biggrin:

Most excellent.
 
  • #8
I have a time machine. It tells the time. :cool:
 
  • #9
Ivan Seeking said:
I know of a time machine that looks like a blue phone booth. :biggrin:

Its a police booth, where they can have a decent spot of Tea and a Scone at any time of day!

Jolly good show
 
  • #10
Nah, they look like this...

http://img125.imageshack.us/img125/1156/timemachine0wq.jpg

I'm one of those that think if time travel is possible then we wouldn't know about it because it would have already happaened and therefore be part of our timeline anyway, or something like that...

You'd never experience the first travel back because it must've happened before you first traveled back...

< goes off to watch Back to the Future III again... >

:confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
Time travel has issues with free will too, unless there is a parallel universe:tongue:
 
  • #12
arunbg said:
Time travel has issues with free will too, unless there is a parallel universe:tongue:
And that is an argument against time travel? :confused:
Sorry but that is completely illogical.
 
  • #13
MeJennifer said:
And that is an argument against time travel? :confused:
Sorry but that is completely illogical.
Not really. If people travel back in time, the future will be predetermined, ie. it will evolve in such a way that ends in the world in which the time traveller travels back. Unless we are constantly branching to multiple universes and the time traveller is in only one...
 
  • #14
J77 said:
Not really. If people travel back in time, the future will be predetermined, ie. it will evolve in such a way that ends in the world in which the time traveller travels back.
Yes and? :confused:
So what if the future will be predetermined, how is that an argument against time travel?
And how can one possibly deduce that "if the future will be predetermined" that that "ends the world".
 
Last edited:
  • #15
Virii said:
What do you think of this theory, time travel will never be created because if it was, then people in the future would have come back to the past and we would know about it by now. Unless of course a select few were able to go to the past, and told nor interacted with anyone.

But my idea was that time travel isn't possible, because if it were, we would know about someone who was in the future that traveled back.
Niven's Law of Time Travel: In any universe in which time travel is possible, it will never be invented.

Niven's thesis runs approximately as follows: If time travel is possible, somebody will use it. Soon, someone will use it to edit the past. Eventually, things will get so bad that someone with access to a time machine will decide that the only worthwhile course of action is to go back in time and stop the inventor before he can develop time travel. This, of course, will edit the editor, and his own machine, out of the timeline.



Heh heh. There's a story idea for all you budding authors: WikiTime.
 
  • #16
Virii said:
But my idea was that time travel isn't possible, because if it were, we would know about someone who was in the future that traveled back.
There is a compromise that sidesteps this problem.

A time machine might only be able to travel back as far as its first day of creation. Thus, if the time machine is activated today, it will never be able to visit yesterday.

I believe this is in essence the way wormholes "work".
 

1. Is time travel possible according to current scientific understanding?

As of now, time travel is not possible according to our current understanding of physics and the laws of the universe. Despite numerous theories and hypotheses, there is no scientific evidence that suggests time travel is achievable.

2. What are some of the proposed theories that suggest time travel could be possible?

Some theories that have been proposed include the concept of wormholes, which are hypothetical tunnels through space-time that could potentially allow for time travel. Another theory is based on the concept of time dilation, which suggests that time can be manipulated by traveling at extreme speeds.

3. What are some of the main challenges or limitations to achieving time travel?

One of the main challenges is the concept of causality, which dictates that an effect cannot occur before its cause. This would create paradoxes if time travel were possible. Additionally, the amount of energy required to manipulate space-time is currently beyond our technological capabilities.

4. Are there any real-life examples or evidence of time travel?

No, there is no concrete evidence or examples of time travel in real life. Many supposed instances of time travelers or time travel experiences have been debunked as hoaxes or misunderstandings.

5. Could advancements in technology or future discoveries change our understanding of time travel?

It is possible that future advancements in technology or scientific discoveries could change our understanding of time travel. However, at this point in time, there is no evidence or indication that this will happen. It is important to continue researching and exploring new ideas, but it is also important to approach the concept of time travel with a critical and scientific mindset.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • New Member Introductions
Replies
6
Views
136
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
848
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
936
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
3
Views
720
Back
Top