- #71
humanino
- 2,527
- 8
DavidWhitbeck said:That's not true. An atheist is someone that doesn't believe in God. That is a subtle but important distinction to be made from believing that God doesn't exist. There is a dichotomy and it's built upon a simple tautology. Those that are not theists are not+theist = a+theist = atheist. It's a simple matter of language. The "atheists" that you describe are a proper subset of the entire set of atheists.
And I would like to add that agnostics are also atheists by definition, simply because they fail to share that positive belief that theists possess.
Where we contemplate that, indeed, the OP needs to clarify the title of this thread.
That was not directed towards you. I made a general statement which I thought might be useful in this discussion.end3r7 said:Besides, I like to think I'm a pretty respectful person...
An example of useful irrationality is when it comes to art and creativity. Mathematical rigor is mandatory for a scientific publication, but creativity sometimes calls us to accept part of our irrationality. Mistakes are sometimes useful as well.