- #36
john16O
- 32
- 0
what time are the results going to be announced?
I hadn't thought of that! And despite your gray hair, I've got a number of years on you, too. If I send Obama a congratulatory note, should I start it out "Good job, you whippersnapper."?Astronuc said:If Obama wins, it'll be the first time that I am older than the president.
They will be announced continuously, as they are tabulated. The whole process will take several hours, but if the numbers are not very close, the race may be over for all practical purposes by as early as about 8:30-9pm EST or thereabouts.john16O said:what time are the results going to be announced?
john16O said:what time are the results going to be announced?
Borek said:What time does voting end? NY time please, this one I know how to convert to MR (my room) time.
Or just tell me how many hours to the end, so that I can use my abacus
BBC said:Too close to call: Colorado, Virginia, North Carolina, Indiana, Montana, Missouri, North Dakota, Georgia, Arizona
Swing states now and in 2004: Michigan, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Florida
There is no such universal policy. For instance, the NBC policy requires only that they not call a winner until 270 EVs have been passed by a single candidate. But if those votes have been called before say, Cali is done voting, they will still name the winner. That's unlikely to happen, of course, unless Obama has a great day, but there is a good chance that the winner will be called before Hawaii (and probably Alaska too) are done.LowlyPion said:For National results I think they are supposed to hold off calling it for the polls to close on the West Coast. But if it's a landslide they may have difficulty keeping a lid on it. After all they all of them want to be the first to call it.
Borek said:Nah, I am no staying awake till 7 a.m. I am not THAT interested
jtbell said:Okay, everybody, this is it. Polls are open now in the eastern USA. Get out there and vote, unless of course you're in an early-voting state and have done it already, and then buy some popcorn for watching the election results tonight.
I'm going to do it right after my 10:00 class.
That IS good news. I wonder how many conservative people will look at the radical policies of the GOP for the last 8 years, and flip to Obama...Cyrus said:Woop woop just voted for Obamarama!
Heres the interesting thing. I talked to a friend who him and his dad I thought would vote McCain for sure. They both voted Obama.
john16O said:People in their 40s who have never voted before but decide to vote today to keep a black man out of office.
LowlyPion said:I seriously doubt that anyone but a Fortune 500 CEO is thinking McCain will be good for their job.
Have you not noticed the economy lately? Businesses closing? People getting laid off?drankin said:How would McCain be bad for our jobs?
Evo said:Have you not noticed the economy lately? Businesses closing? People getting laid off?
drankin said:How would McCain be bad for our jobs?
LowlyPion said:We need fiscal responsibility and despite McCain's big talk about cutting expenses - he can't - and adherence to trickle down economics - we can see it doesn't work - and his life long devotion to deregulation that only guarantees further abuse with another crisis in healthcare on the launching pad with his idiotic privatizations and another crisis building as he extends his ideas to Social Security.
All in all I'd say his proposed policies are a toxic brew of ill thought out schemes designed not to solve any problem other than to get him elected. Any further weakening of the economy by someone erratic like McCain will of course not be good for jobs.
LowlyPion said:We need fiscal responsibility and despite McCain's big talk about cutting expenses - he can't - and adherence to trickle down economics - we can see it doesn't work - and his life long devotion to deregulation that only guarantees further abuse with another crisis in healthcare on the launching pad with his idiotic privatizations and another crisis building as he extends his ideas to Social Security.
All in all I'd say his proposed policies are a toxic brew of ill thought out schemes designed not to solve any problem other than to get him elected. Any further weakening of the economy by someone erratic like McCain will of course not be good for jobs.
john16O said:yeah so let's spread the wealth!..uh no! Let's say you make straight As in college and I make straight Ds. Let's Average them out and well both get Cs? Same idea as obamas' economic policy. Socialism. I work hard and go to college and study my butt of so that way I DON'T make as much money as someone who is contributing nothing to society. If you want this, than move to Sweden where everyone is on an equal scale..lol
Do you actually think Obama is going to take part of your paycheck and give it to someone else?john16O said:yeah so let's spread the wealth!..uh no! Let's say you make straight As in college and I make straight Ds. Let's Average them out and well both get Cs? Same idea as obamas' economic policy. Socialism. I work hard and go to college and study my butt of so that way I DON'T make as much money as someone who is contributing nothing to society. If you want this, than move to Sweden where everyone is on an equal scale..lol
Evo said:Do you actually think Obama is going to take part of your paycheck and give it to someone else?
LowlyPion said:You only work for money?
It's a 3% increase on every dollar made over $250,000, which means under Obama you'll pay 30 dollars more taxes on every 1,000 dollars you make over $250,000. It doesn't seem that bad (at least in my opinion).drankin said:He already said as much to Joe the Plumber.
Evo said:Do you actually think Obama is going to take part of your paycheck and give it to someone else?
chasely said:It's a 3% increase on every dollar made over $250,000, which means under Obama you'll pay 30 dollars more taxes on every 1,000 dollars you make over $250,000. It doesn't seem that bad (at least in my opinion).
In other news...Facebook votes up to 3.25 million.
EDIT: Shouldn't this convo be in the "election 2008" thread?
drankin said:What is the purpose of these extra taxes? Doesn't our government tax us enough?? Why do we want to give more of our hard earned money to the government?
And you know that guy was totally bogus.drankin said:He already said as much to Joe the Plumber.
Don't forget that people don't pay the 6.2% Social Security tax on income over $102,000, so they are paying less than those making under $102,000. Never mind tax shelters and loopholes the wealthy have to keep part of their income from being taxed.chasely said:It's a 3% increase on every dollar made over $250,000, which means under Obama you'll pay 30 dollars more taxes on every 1,000 dollars you make over $250,000. It doesn't seem that bad (at least in my opinion).