What are the topological properties of the FLRW model?

In summary, the conversation discusses the FLRW metric and its implications for the topology and curvature of a connected Riemannian manifold M that is everywhere isotropic. It is stated that M can be a sphere, a hyberboloid, or flat depending on the curvature. However, it is not necessarily simply connected or complete. The possibility of obtaining different spaces through quotients by isometries is also mentioned. It is suggested that the global isotropy of M could potentially lead to different results. Examples of non-simply connected isotropic manifolds are given, such as the real projective spaces. It is also noted that no flat Riemannian manifold except Euclidean space can be globally isotropic. Finally, a
  • #1
kostas230
96
3
So, I was trying to do a derivation of my own for the FLRW metric, since I couldn't understand the one Wald had. The spatial slice [itex]M[/itex] is a connected Riemannian manifold which is everywhere isotropic. That is, in every point [itex]p\in M[/itex] and unit vectors in [itex]v_1,v_2\in T_p\left(M\right)[/itex] there is an isometry [itex]\phi:M\rightarrow M[/itex] with [itex]\phi_*v_1 = v_2[/itex]. By isotropy, the sectional curvature is a pointwise function and by Schur's Lemma, [itex]M[/itex] it's constant.

My question is the following. Under those assumptions, can it be proved that [itex]M[/itex] is simply connected and complete? The FLRW metric suggests that [itex]M[/itex] is:
(a) a sphere if the curvature is constant.
(b) a hyberboloid if the curvature is negative,
(c) flat if the curvature is zero.
all if which are connected, simply connected and complete manifolds.

P.S. This may be the wrong section for this thread. If so I apologize :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Statements about curvature are only local. There is a lot you can still do with the global topology. Most notably, you can take quotients by discrete subsets of the isometry group.

For example, if M is positively curved, you can obtain lens spaces. If M has zero curvature, you can obtain tori. If M has constant negative curvature, there are loads of different things you can do, of which this is one example:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seifert–Weber_space

So no, you cannot conclude that M is simply connected.

However, you might be able to prove something if your space is globally isotropic rather than merely locally so. That is, if the isometry in your definition is required to be a global one. In the above examples, since you've quotiented out by a discrete group of global isometries, you will probably not have enough global isometries left over to map any unit vector into any other. For example, on a torus the rotational isometries that fix a point are reduced to a discrete group.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
- Based on what Ben said I think that the real projective spaces of constant curvature are examples of a non-simply connected isotropic manifolds. Their fundamental group is Z/2Z.

- No flat Riemannian manifold except Euclidean space can be globally isotropic. The same point that Ben made about the torus also applies. All such manifolds are quotients of flat Euclidean space by a discrete group that contains a lattice and arbitrary rotations of Euclidean space will not preserve a lattice. So for instance a flat cylinder or a Klein bottle can not be globally isotropic
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Thank you guys, that was really helpful! :)
 
  • #5

1. What is the FLRW model?

The FLRW model, also known as the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker model, is a mathematical description of the universe that is based on Einstein's theory of general relativity. It is a homogeneous and isotropic model, meaning that it assumes the universe is the same in all directions and at all points in time.

2. What is the significance of topology in the FLRW model?

Topology refers to the spatial structure of the universe in the FLRW model. It describes how the three-dimensional space is connected and the overall shape of the universe. The topology of the FLRW model can greatly impact the evolution and dynamics of the universe.

3. How does the FLRW model explain the expansion of the universe?

The FLRW model incorporates the concept of the expanding universe by including a scale factor, which represents the change in the size of the universe over time. This scale factor is dependent on the density and energy content of the universe and is used to calculate the rate of expansion.

4. What is the role of dark energy in the FLRW model?

Dark energy is a theoretical form of energy that is believed to make up a large portion of the universe. In the FLRW model, dark energy is incorporated as a constant or a variable term in the equations that describe the evolution of the universe. It is believed to be the driving force behind the accelerated expansion of the universe.

5. What are the limitations of the FLRW model?

The FLRW model is a simplified model of the universe and does not take into account all physical phenomena, such as the presence of dark matter and the effects of gravitational waves. It also assumes a perfect homogeneity and isotropy, which may not be entirely accurate. Therefore, the model has its limitations and is continuously being refined to better understand the universe.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Poll
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • Poll
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
15
Views
19K
  • Poll
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top