What is the physical significance of torque being a vector in an electric motor?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the physical significance of torque as a vector quantity in the context of electric motors and rotational motion. Participants explore the mathematical definition of torque and its implications for understanding rotation in both two and three dimensions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant associates torque with a scalar quantity defined by the formula ##torque=rFsin\theta##, questioning how it can also be a vector aligned with the axis of rotation.
  • Another participant explains that torque is mathematically defined as the cross product of the force and the position vector, emphasizing its role in determining the axis of rotation in three dimensions.
  • A later reply reiterates the mathematical definition of torque and its significance in providing the axis of rotation, particularly in three-dimensional contexts.
  • One participant raises a question about the physical meaning of torque being a vector that coincides with the axis of rotation.
  • Another participant shares a personal anecdote about confusion regarding stable equilibrium and restoring torque in physical systems, relating it to the discussion on torque.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and confusion regarding the vector nature of torque and its implications for rotational motion. No consensus is reached on the physical meaning of torque as a vector.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the difference between two-dimensional and three-dimensional considerations of torque, noting that the axis of rotation is often taken for granted in simpler scenarios.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in the mathematical and conceptual foundations of torque, particularly in the context of rotational dynamics and electric motors, may find this discussion beneficial.

greg_rack
Gold Member
Messages
361
Reaction score
79
Hi guys,
In my head, torque has also been associated with a bare SCALAR physical quantity given by the formula ##torque=rFsin\theta## which caused a rigid body to spin around its axis.
Now, studying magnetism, I find out that torque is a VECTOR, which magnitude is indeed given by ##rFsin\theta## and with the direction of the axis and pointing upwards/downwards depending on if the body is spinning clockwise/counterclockwise.
Now, my question is: if torque let's a body spin, how could it be a vector coincident with the axis of rotation? Which physical meaning has its vectorial nature?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mathematically the torque ##\vec{T}## is the cross product of the force ##\vec{F}##and the position vector ##\vec{r}## of the force. In vector notation it is ##\vec{T}=\vec{r}\times\vec{F}##. You can check more about the cross product on these pages
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross_product
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-hand_rule
I know if you thinking in 2 dimensions you probably think like "all I want to know is if the torque is clockwise or counterclockwise", because in 2D the axis of rotation is taken for granted and is usually perpendicular to the plane of the page, however when we try to work in 3 dimensions, it is important why the torque give us the axis of rotation under which this torque will rotate the body if it was the total torque. That's it's physical meaning, it gives us the axis of rotation.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban and greg_rack
Delta2 said:
Mathematically the torque ##\vec{T}## is the cross product of the force ##\vec{F}##and the position vector ##\vec{r}## of the force. In vector notation it is ##\vec{T}=\vec{r}\times\vec{F}##. You can check more about the cross product on these pages
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross_product
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-hand_rule
I know if you thinking in 2 dimensions you probably think like "all I want to know is if the torque is clockwise or counterclockwise", because in 2D the axis of rotation is taken for granted and is usually perpendicular to the plane of the page, however when we try to work in 3 dimensions, it is important why the torque give us the axis of rotation under which this torque will rotate the body if it was the total torque. That's it's physical meaning, it gives us the axis of rotation.
Thanks, got it!
 
greg_rack said:
Now, my question is: if torque let's a body spin, how could it be a vector coincident with the axis of rotation? Which physical meaning has its vectorial nature?

 
  • Love
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: greg_rack and etotheipi
A.T. said:


This is nice! When I was a bit smaller, something that confused me was that you come across these sorts of ornaments in garden centres and whatnot

1605960730734.png


that are in stable equilibrium. Without that small vertical piece, tilting the thing on the top by an arbitrary angle would contract the perpendicular distances of the centres of mass of either side to the axis by the same fraction, and the ornament would remain in its new equilibrium position (i.e. neutral equilibrium). But the vertical piece destroys that symmetry, as demonstrated in your video, and ensures that there is actually a restoring torque!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban and greg_rack

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
645
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
743
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
9K