Torque = r x F

  • Thread starter Harmony
  • Start date
  • #1
Harmony
203
0
I saw in my reference book that T=r * F , and T=F * r is unacceptable. Why is the latter unacceptable?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
mybsaccownt
63
0
Last edited:
  • #3
turdferguson
312
0
Also, the book probably doesn't want you to confuse units of torque (meter*Newtons) and units of energy (Newton*meters). Get in the habit of putting the distance first, as it will help you with the cross products
 
  • #4
cristo
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
8,140
74
Also, the book probably doesn't want you to confuse units of torque (meter*Newtons) and units of energy (Newton*meters).

Huh? The (standard) unit of torque is the Newton-metre; I've never heard of it being called a metre-Newton! Besides, clearly the units Newton and metre commute.

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton_metre)
 
Last edited:
  • #5
turdferguson
312
0
If the unit of torque is the Newton-meter, that implies that its the same as a joule. By using the term "meter-Newton", you can easily differentiate between torque and energy. Even though you just informed me that its not technically SI, it makes more sense to me and probably to someone just starting out
 

Suggested for: Torque = r x F

Replies
7
Views
122
  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
293
Replies
2
Views
278
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
426
  • Last Post
2
Replies
42
Views
969
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
393
  • Last Post
Replies
14
Views
844
Replies
6
Views
295
Replies
45
Views
1K
Top