Torricelli's Law Problem

  • #1
Okazaki
56
0

Homework Statement


(This is a continuation of the problem where I proved Torricelli's Law: v = (2gh))

The water level in a tank lies a distance H above the floor. There is a hole in the tank that a distance h below the water level
a.) Find the distance x from the wall of the tank at which the leaked stream of water hits the floor
b.) Could another hole be punched at another depth h' so that this second stream would have the same range? If so, at what depth?

Homework Equations


Δx = (vf2 - vi2)/g
v = (2gh)

The Attempt at a Solution


At first, I was not really sure what to do here at all (and I probably ended up solving it completely wrong.)

So, basically, I wasn't exactly sure how to find the distance, since I only knew the initial velocity in the x direction (or, at least, I assumed v = (2gh)) was the velocity of the water in the x direction based off the picture in the problem.)

So, what I tried was:
(Since the equation I had to derive from Torricelli's law in the problem I had to do before this ended up being Δv = (2gh), I assumed:)

Δx = (2gh)/g
= 2h

For b, I'm completely confused on even where to begin solving for the equation.
 

Attachments

  • pf2.PNG
    pf2.PNG
    2.3 KB · Views: 1,821

Answers and Replies

  • #2
36,089
13,009
Where does that Δx formula come from?
Your water, once it leaves the tank, moves horizontally and is in free fall. What do you know about objects in free fall?
 
  • #3
Okazaki
56
0
Where does that Δx formula come from?
Your water, once it leaves the tank, moves horizontally and is in free fall. What do you know about objects in free fall?

Wait a minute...the water has a vy when it leaves the tank of 0 m/s, doesn't it? If so, then I think I can solve it.
 
  • #4
36,089
13,009
Right, assuming "y" is your vertical coordinate.
 
  • #5
Okazaki
56
0
Right, assuming "y" is your vertical coordinate.

Well, I over-thought that problem.

Then:

vi-y = 0 m/s
So:
==> vf-y = vi-y + 2gh
= 0 + 2gh
= 2gh

So:
vf-y = vi-y + gt
t = vf-y/g
==> t = (2gh)/g

So:
This is where I use: v = (2gh)
Δx = vi-yt + 0.5at2
= (2g*(H-h)) * (2gh)/g
= 2 √(h(H-h))

Still not sure about b, though. Would I just work backwards?
 
  • #6
haruspex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
38,437
7,954
Δx = vi-yt + 0.5at2
= (2g*(H-h)) * (2gh)/g
= 2 √(h(H-h))

Still not sure about b, though. Would I just work backwards?
If a hole at height h' produces the same Δx, what equation can you write?
 
  • #7
36,089
13,009
A velocity cannot be equal to 2gh, the units do not match. And I don't understand the other steps, but the result looks right.
 
  • #8
Okazaki
56
0
A velocity cannot be equal to 2gh, the units do not match. And I don't understand the other steps, but the result looks right.
v = (2gh) was what I had to prove in the previous problem.
 
  • #9
Okazaki
56
0
A velocity cannot be equal to 2gh, the units do not match. And I don't understand the other steps, but the result looks right.

Wait, I see the issue. In my notes, I think I had a square root sign. It just never made it onto paper.
 
  • #10
Okazaki
56
0
If a hole at height h' produces the same Δx, what equation can you write?

Well, if it's at h', then the Vi-x will be √(2g(H-h')) and you can work backwards from there.
 
  • #11
haruspex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
38,437
7,954
Well, if it's at h', then the Vi-x will be √(2g(H-h')) and you can work backwards from there.
Better, consider h' in respect of this equation in your post #5: Δx = 2 √(h(H-h)).
 
  • #12
36,089
13,009
Drawing a sketch of Δx as function of h could be useful.
 

Suggested for: Torricelli's Law Problem

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
0
Views
8K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
956
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
Top