I'm trying to prove that boundedness implies total boundedness in R^n. I'm stuck mostly because I can't convert my geometric intuition into maths. I am failing at the pivotal step where I use the finite-dimensionality. Any help would be appreciated.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Total boundedness in R^n

Loading...

Similar Threads - Total boundedness | Date |
---|---|

B Base space Minkowski, fiber is S^1, total spaces? | Jul 31, 2016 |

Total derivative in action of the field theory | Nov 13, 2014 |

Euler characteristic as a total derivative | May 2, 2013 |

How to make the total length of a trail as short as possible? | May 22, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**