- #1

- 51

- 0

_{|t=0}[tex]det(I + tA) = tr(A) [/tex]? I did it for 2x2 but I can't figure out a generalization. Thanks

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter jakey
- Start date

- #1

- 51

- 0

- #2

radou

Homework Helper

- 3,115

- 6

Did you try to use the definition of the determinant to conclude something?

- #3

- 51

- 0

Did you try to use the definition of the determinant to conclude something?

Which definition? Hmm, the co-factor expansion?

- #4

radou

Homework Helper

- 3,115

- 6

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leibniz_formula_for_determinants

So, after examining this definition (which may seem a bit complicated at the first glance, and if there is an easier way to prove it, it would be nice) you can conclude that the only permutation which generates a polynomial with a non-zero coefficient for

- #5

radou

Homework Helper

- 3,115

- 6

Oh yes, and note that the identity permutation is an even one.

- #6

- 402

- 1

Now, for any polynomial, the t term is the symmetric of the sum of its roots; you may see this by looking at its factorization:

[tex]p\left(x\right)=a\left(x-r_1\right)\left(x-r_2\right)\cdots\left(x-r_n\right)[/tex]

So, when you differentiate [itex]p\left(-t)[/itex] and set [itex]t=0[/itex], what will be the only term left? And how is the trace of [itex]A[/itex] related to its eigenvalues?

Share: