Dear all,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The possibility of black holes can be traced back to a special solution of the Einstein's equations, the famous Schwarzschild metric in 1916.

I find this very impressive, since at that time, the GR was a very young theory and it would have been more than natural to be skeptic about such a solution and the theory that leads to this solution.

I would like to know which aspects of GR, which 'ingredients', are the root cause for the Schwarzschild solution and the discovery of black holes. Or in other words, how much of GR is needed to come to the idea of blackholes.

Am I right to say that clocks slowing down in a gravitational field is a consequence of the equivalence principle and SR? And would it be right the say that black holes are the consequence of that in the limit of large gravitational fields? Could the Schwarzschild radius be derived from such a simple analysis, and how justified could it be?

Michel

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Tracing black holes back

Loading...

Similar Threads for Tracing black holes | Date |
---|---|

A question about trace | Jun 17, 2015 |

Question about reverse tracing the Einstein field equations | Aug 18, 2014 |

Black hole collapse - ray tracing | Mar 2, 2014 |

A few very basics questions regarding 4 and 3 momenta and the trace of | Sep 17, 2013 |

Trace of SEM tensor | Oct 27, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**