Transformation of a 2x2 matrix with Pauli matrices

  • Thread starter CAF123
  • Start date
  • #1
CAF123
Gold Member
2,915
88

Homework Statement


Suppose the vector ##\phi## transforms under SU(2) as: $$\phi' = (\exp(-i \alpha \cdot t))_{ij}\phi_j,$$ where ## (t_j)_{kl} = −i \epsilon_{jkl}## and ##j, k, l \in \left\{1, 2, 3\right\}.##

Based on ##\phi,## we define the ##2 \times 2## matrix ##\sigma = \tau \cdot \phi## where ##\tau## are the Pauli matrices.

1) Assume that the real parameters ##\alpha = (\alpha_1, \alpha_2, \alpha_3)## are small and show, by expanding up to first order in ##\alpha##, that the transformation law for the ##2 \times 2## matrix ##\sigma## is given by ##\sigma \rightarrow \sigma' = U\sigma U^{\dagger}## where ##U = \exp(i\alpha \cdot \tau/2)##

(b) By construction, ##\sigma## is hermitian and traceless. Verify that ##\sigma'## is also hermitian and traceless, and that det ##\sigma'## = det ##\sigma##. Show that ##\phi'## and ##\phi## are related by a rotation.

Homework Equations


The ##(t_j)_{kl}## are 3 matrices each of which are 3x3. These correspond to matrices in the adjoint representation of SU(2). I think I can write ##\tau_i \rightarrow u\tau_i u^{\dagger}##, where ##u \approx 1 + i \beta^a \tau^b ## with ##u \in SU(2)## - i.e can decompose a general group element in terms of the lie algebra and since the taus are 2x2 matrices the corresponding representation of the generators are also pauli matrices. (I think?)

The Attempt at a Solution


##\sigma_{ij} \rightarrow (\tau_k' \phi_k')_{ij}##. Using the transformation of the taus above and the algebra ##[\tau_a/2, \tau_b/2] = i/2 \epsilon_{abc} \tau_c## I get that $$\tau_k' = \tau_k + 2i \beta_a \epsilon_{akm}\tau_m$$

The transformation of ##\phi## is given in the question and, as far as I understand, it is transforming in the adjoint representation of SU(2).

$$\phi_k' = (1-i\alpha^b(t^b)_{kl})\phi_l = (\delta_{kl} - i \alpha^b (-i \epsilon_{bkl}))\phi_l = \phi_k - \alpha^b \epsilon_{bkl} \phi_l$$

Putting these two transformations together (that of ##\phi## and that of the ##\tau_k## ) I don't get something resembling the answer. Did I go wrong somewhere?

Thanks!
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
18,263
7,946
Thanks for the post! This is an automated courtesy bump. Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
 

Related Threads on Transformation of a 2x2 matrix with Pauli matrices

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
883
  • Last Post
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Top