Transverse Doppler effect

  • Thread starter arildno
  • Start date
  • #1
arildno
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
9,970
132
I saw in a chapter on special relativity a derivation of the transverse Doppler effect, which seemed okay, but I have a question concerning this:

If the motion of a source is always perpendicular to the position vector connecting the observer to the moving source (i.e. the distance remains constant), that is the source rotates about the obs., does not
(technically, at least) the validity of the result (transv. D. eff.) depend on general relativity, rather than special relativity, since the source's rest frame is in non-uniform motion relative to the observer's rest frame?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Doc Al
Mentor
45,010
1,286
As I am sure you realize, the derivation of the transverse Doppler effect does not require that the motion of the source be in pure transverse motion. As long as there is a transverse component of motion, there will be a transverse Doppler effect due to time dilation. In any case, even if the light source does purely circle around the observer, the observing frame is still inertial, so special relativity should be sufficient.

Or have I missed your point?
 
  • #3
DW
328
0
arildno said:
I saw in a chapter on special relativity a derivation of the transverse Doppler effect, which seemed okay, but I have a question concerning this:

If the motion of a source is always perpendicular to the position vector connecting the observer to the moving source (i.e. the distance remains constant), that is the source rotates about the obs., does not
(technically, at least) the validity of the result (transv. D. eff.) depend on general relativity, rather than special relativity, since the source's rest frame is in non-uniform motion relative to the observer's rest frame?
The special relativistic formula for transverse Doppler shift will still be valid for describing how the light is seen according to the inertial frame observer that was emmited from the circling object unless you are also considering a gravitational source such as a planet about which it orbits for example. Then, one must use general relativity to determine the total relativistic Doppler shift.
 
  • #4
arildno
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
9,970
132
Thx for the response!
Doc Al, yes, I was aware of that the derivation of the transverse Doppler effect did not at all depend upon a pure transverse motion; in fact, the result followed from the decomposition of a uniform motion (in accordance with spec. rel.) into a radial and transverse component,
the radial comp. accounting for the classical Doppler effect, whereas the transverse effect enters as a result of the time dilation factor (since the transverse velocity component is part of the total velocity).

Hence, I have no trouble in recognizing the presence of a transverse Doppler effect in the case of a general, uniform motion, and that this is derivable from the postulates/conditions for the validity of special relativity.

My point only concerned the limiting case (radial comp->0),
i.e. when the motion can no longer be regarded as strictly uniform, since the source will, in fact, rotate around the observer.

However, from your own answer, and DW's, I think I have gained a satisfactory response.
 

Related Threads on Transverse Doppler effect

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
859
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
355
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
3K
Top