Travelling at the speed of light?

  • Thread starter Einstein
  • Start date
  • #1
Einstein
13
1
If I was traveling at half the speed of light from A to B and another person traveling at half the speed of light from B to A (not directly towards each other, side-by-side), would i be traveling at the speed of light relative to the other person. If so, what would i see when i look at this other person?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
jcsd
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,101
12
v = (u + v')/(1 + uv'/c2)

This is how to sum two velocites, u and v', in SR where c is the speed of light in the vacuum.

If we input the velocities into the equation as a fraction of c, then all the c's oin the bottom of the equation cancel and we're left with:

v = (0.5c + 0.5c)/(1 + 0.25) = 0.8c

Therefore you will observe the other person traveling at 0.8c or 4/5 of the speed of light relative to you.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
jcsd
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,101
12
I'll just add for speeds a lot lower that c the two velocities do add algerbraically, that is :

v ≈ u + v'

for values of u and v' significantly smaller than c.

For example, taking two objects that both appear to be traveling ~650 mph (10-6 c) in oppoiste directions to a 'stationary' observer the difference in observed velocities will only be about 1 part in a trillion.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
SEG9585
34
0
So, according to your theory:

If 2 photons were moving towards each other, both moving at the speed of light:

v = (c + c)/(1 + c^2/c^2) = 2c/2 = c

The photons would observe each other moving at the speed of light? If that's the case, how can it tell whether the other photon is moving at all of not?

v = (c + 0)/(1 + 0/c^2) = c/1 = c
 
  • #5
jcsd
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,101
12
It's not my theory, it's Lorentz's/Einstein's (the equation is derived from the Lorentz transformations), it's called the special theory of relativity.

According to the transformation, both photons would observe each other traveling at the speed of light, but reference frames at this speed are forbidden anyway.
 
  • #6
selfAdjoint
Staff Emeritus
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
6,881
10
Originally posted by jcsd
I'll just add for speeds a lot lower that c the two velocities do add algerbraically, that is :

v ≈ u + v'

for values of u and v' significantly smaller than c.

For example, taking two objects that both appear to be traveling ~650 mph (10-6 c) in oppoiste directions to a 'stationary' observer the difference in observed velocities will only be about 1 part in a trillion.

Actually the same rule holds for low speeds - it holds for all speeds, but if you try it for speeds around a billionth of c, which are the speeds we encounter (feet per second) then the Lorentz formula becomes normal addition to a high degree of accuracy. But there is no cutoff where relativity addition stops and the familiar addition begins.
 
  • #7
quartodeciman
372
0
One photon has velocity +c and the other photon has velocity -c, both relative to some initially-given reference frame.
The relative velocities ought to be calculated by a difference formula:

u' = (u - v)/(1 - uv/c2)

.

So, for the velocity of the +c photon relative to the -c photon,

u' = ((+c) - (-c))/(1-(+c)(-c)/c2) = (+2c)/(+2) = +c

For the velocity of the -c photon relative to the +c photon,

u' = ((-c) - (+c))/(1-(-c)(+c)/c2) = (-2c)/(+2) = -c

. The relative velocities would be equal in magnitude, but oppositely directed.

There is a problem with all this. In order to derive composition theorems like this, guaranteeing that the postulates of special relativity are enforced, it is necessary to assume implicitly that all relative velocities between observers have magnitudes less than c. So, it is not a foregone conclusion that the two photons define reference frames for which the composition formula is valid. But it does appear to give "appropriate" answers. One photon gets a relative velocity of +c and the other gets a relative velocity of -c.
 

Suggested for: Travelling at the speed of light?

Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
796
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
362
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
642
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
25
Views
567
Replies
7
Views
375
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Top