The author introduces the "Maximal Principle" in order to prove that every vector space has a basis. For reference, I'll restate it as he wrote it: "Let F be a family of sets. If, for each chain C [subset of] F, there exists a member of F that contains each member of C, then F contains a maximal member".(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

If a chain C of F is finite, then by comparing all the members of C, we should be able to find a member in C (hence in F) that contains all the others. Therefore, if the hypothesis are to fail anywhere, it should be possible for an infinite chain to not have a member that contains all the others. But in his proof that every vector space has a basis, the author states: "But since C is a chain, one of these [members of C], say A, contains all the others" without knowing whether C is finite.

Could someone clear my head for me?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Trouble w/ Maximal Principle (Zorn's Lemma)

Loading...

Similar Threads - Trouble Maximal Principle | Date |
---|---|

I Simple Modules and Maximal Right Ideals ... | Feb 4, 2017 |

I Trouble with exact sequence | Sep 15, 2016 |

Trouble understanding simple Galois Theory example | Feb 25, 2015 |

Trouble setting up to prove unique factorization | Aug 16, 2014 |

Having trouble understanding minimal polynomial problems | Jan 30, 2014 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**