Tsunami Alert Active! Oregon and Washington (1 Viewer)

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Ivan Seeking

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
6,781
169
Well that's a first!

At 7:56PM PDT, an emergency alert was issued due to a large earthquake - initial est mag 7.2 - around Eureka California.
 

Evo

Mentor
22,447
2,262
Ivan Seeking said:
Well that's a first!

At 7:56PM PDT, an emergency alert was issued due to a large earthquake - initial est mag 7.2 - around Eureka California.
I hope you're not close to the coast!!
 

SOS2008

Gold Member
0
0
Ivan Seeking said:
Well that's a first!

At 7:56PM PDT, an emergency alert was issued due to a large earthquake - initial est mag 7.2 - around Eureka California.
7.2 is gettin' up there. :eek:
 
Uh oh... Hope everything is ok.
 
So I just heard that the California coast is lit up too.
I really hope it's just a false alarm.
 

Math Is Hard

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
4,435
22
Do I need to stuff the cat in a pillowcase and start driving East?
 
1,068
7
Better to be safe then sorry with the alert system. I hope for the best.
 
R

rachmaninoff

Guest
I've heard it's been called off...
 
Someone here said something about that too. Appearantly it will happen in the next maybe 30 min if it does at all.
 

Pengwuino

Gold Member
4,764
10
It should be called off. They were reporting the mexico/california border's tsunami alerts were activated but called off about 30 minutes late.
 

Astronuc

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
18,176
1,563
The 7.2 quake near Eureka/Crescent City is shallow, only 10 km (6.2 mi) - 146 km (91 mi) WSW of Crescent City, CA.

It follows two other quake clusters, with a 5.2 quake (33.533°N, 116.578°W, Depth = 14.1 km (8.8 miles)) in S. California on Sunday, June 12, 99 km (62 miles) NNE (32°) from San Diego, CA, and the other a 5.0 quake (lat. 51.400N, long. 178.840E) at depth of 15.0km, and located 161 km (100 mi) WSW of Adak, AK.

Things seem to be heating up on the Eastern belt of the Ring of Fire.
 
Last edited:

Danger

Gold Member
9,450
244
Math Is Hard said:
Do I need to stuff the cat in a pillowcase and start driving East?
If you can get the pillowcase off of Gale's head, and the cat off of yours...
Anyhow, I hope it has been cancelled.
 
622
2
Danger said:
If you can get the pillowcase off of Gale's head, and the cat off of yours...
Anyhow, I hope it has been cancelled.
man, i was gonna comment about that too... damn you.

btw, ring of fire is like, pacific ocean right?
 

Ivan Seeking

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
6,781
169
Evo said:
I hope you're not close to the coast!!
No, we're find here. We have a small mountain range between us and the ocean.

Has anyone heard any damage reports from N California?
 

Danger

Gold Member
9,450
244
Gale17 said:
man, i was gonna comment about that too... damn you.
I was gone for almost 3 hours. Just dumb luck that I checked back two minutes ahead of you.
 
Gale said:
btw, ring of fire is like, pacific ocean right?
I thought it was Johnny Cash... ;-p
 

Pengwuino

Gold Member
4,764
10
no your wrong, it was a dumb movie that i didnt bother going to see :D
 

Kerrie

Oregonian
Staff Emeritus
Gold Member
806
14
i look at the USG website frequently, and there have been many large earthquakes over the past week up and down the ring of fire, from Alaska to California to South America. very interesting how it all happens so close together...
 

Astronuc

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
18,176
1,563
Kerrie said:
i look at the USG website frequently, and there have been many large earthquakes over the past week up and down the ring of fire, from Alaska to California to South America. very interesting how it all happens so close together...
Within the same system, such as the Sunda trench near Sumatra, one earthquake relieves stress locally, but that produces an increase in stress elsewhere. An increase in activity from Alaska to Chile could mean something big is going on along the entire Eastern Pacific ROF. It bears watching.

I just wonder if we may start seeing more stonger > 7.0 and more frequent earthquakes. That would be very troublesome given the development along the Pacific coast.

Don't forget that the Cascades, Sierra Nevada, Bitteroots, and Rocky Mountains exist because of the tectonic movements. Could we be seeing a new period of significant activity?
 

Ivan Seeking

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
6,781
169
Astronuc said:
one earthquake relieves stress locally, but that produces an increase in stress elsewhere.
It's funny, but not too long ago that was considered to be nonsense.

Geologists have been watching the three sisters [mountains] here in Oregon. One has a bulge that has been growing at a worrisome rate. Mt Shasta and Mt Lassen in California have also sbeen showing signs of activity.
 

The Physics Forums Way

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top