I just noticed the following on the Philsci archive.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Judit, X. Madárasz and István, Németi and Gergely, Székely (2005) Twin Paradox and the Logical Foundation of Relativity Theory.

http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00002358/

They seem to be saying that inertial frames can be dealt with using algebraic numbers, which allows a 1st order axiomatization. However accelerated frames require further axioms, equivalent to moving to the real numbers (I'm not sure whether this means higher order axioms). This seems reasonable to me, since acceleration means differential equations, which means going beyond the algebraic numbers.

I'd be interested to hear other people's opinions on this.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Twin Paradox and the Logical Foundation of Relativity Theory

Loading...

Similar Threads for Twin Paradox Logical | Date |
---|---|

I Paradox analyses related? | Mar 21, 2018 |

B About Fitch's paradox | Nov 8, 2017 |

A Can Somebody solve the Rich Investor's Paradox? | May 22, 2017 |

I Question: Proposed Solution to Two Envelope Paradox | Apr 21, 2017 |

P(5 sets of twins in the SD state football tournament) | Nov 9, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**