Twin paradox in an empty universe

In summary: Earth, would result in an acceleration of the Earth. However, applying the same energy to the spacecan which is in turn accelerating towards the Earth...doesn't result in an acceleration of the Earth.In summary, the spacecan does not accelerate towards the Earth when it is accelerated.
  • #1
Wiemster
72
0
The obvious objection to the famous thought experiment with one of a twins moving away from the Earth is, couldn't you have moved the twin together with the Earth in the opposite direction to yield the opposite conclusion. Thes standard answer is that the symmetry is broken when the returning twin accelerates by returning. Moving the other twin together with the Earth and the rest of the universe is not the same thing as moving only the leaving twin.

Does this imply there is some connection between all the mass in the universe and inertia a la Mach?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Wiemster said:
Does this imply there is some connection between all the mass in the universe and inertia a la Mach?

what exactly are you asking? How do mass and inertia have anything to do with the twin paradox (qualitatively at least)?
 
  • #3
Well, without any other mass in the universe, the situation would be entirely symmetric and no twin can come back older than the other. Now add some mass to this universe and an asymmetry arises and there is such a thing as accelerating with respect to the background of mass in the universe. Doesn't this thought experiment clearly show the relation between inertia (as is overcome in accelerating with respect to the universe, back to earth) and the mass of the universe?
 
  • #4
Wiemster said:
The obvious objection to the famous thought experiment with one of a twins moving away from the Earth is, couldn't you have moved the twin together with the Earth in the opposite direction to yield the opposite conclusion. Thes standard answer is that the symmetry is broken when the returning twin accelerates by returning. Moving the other twin together with the Earth and the rest of the universe is not the same thing as moving only the leaving twin.

Does this imply there is some connection between all the mass in the universe and inertia a la Mach?
The twin that stays home goes straight up the time axis. The twin that travels and returns
moves out along the x-axis and then returns to the other twin.
Since d\tau^2=dt^2-c^2 dx^2, the twin that travels has a smaller [tex]\int d\tau[/tex].
It has nothing to do with the rest of the universe.
 
  • #5
pam said:
It has nothing to do with the rest of the universe.

How can you say that and still talk about a 'traveling twin' and one that 'stays home'. These statements make an indirect reference to the rest of the universe. Without the rest of the universe there can be made no distinction between the twins and neither will come back younger or older than the other. Actually by conservation of momentum in order to return they must both change their momentum in an equal but opposite way from the center of mass.

Now add some mass and the 'traveling twin' can push against some massive object to change its direction back home. The symmetry breaking can only occur in a universe with mass where an acceleration is possible. Don't you think this clearly shows a connection between inertia of an object and the mass in the universe a la Mach?
 
  • #6
Wiemster said:
Well, without any other mass in the universe, the situation would be entirely symmetric and no twin can come back older than the other.
We actually don't know that, you are in effect assuming something and then reasoning from it to create a paradox if what you assumed isn't true. All we can can say is that (in the absence of real gravity), if each twin carries an accelerometer with them, the one carried by the "younger" twin on return will have to have spiked through the roof during the turnaround. If that reading of that instrument somehow depended on the rest of the universe, then your symmetry assumption would be right, but in your empty universe inertia would not exist and physics as we know it would fail, so we really have no idea what would happen in that universe. However, if the rest of the universe has nothing to do with the reading of that accelerometer, then it is also not the thing that breaks the symmetry in your thought experiment, and the twin paradox could unfold normally even in an empty universe. I tend to think in terms of the latter picture, but it's pretty hard to suggest an observational test, given the limitations in how many universes we get to try.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
so is it fair to say, the difference in age is due to the asymmetry in acceleration history?:confused:
 
  • #8
Yes, it is. Also note that the "twin-earth" and "twin" are NOT symmetric. The one that stays on the Earth is subject to a gravitational force that the other is not.
 
  • #9
Wiemster, please reply to this.

The motion is symmetrical, but the casuse is not.
The energy to launch the spacecan, if applied to the Earth would not produce the same motion, but would be dispersed as heat. The Earth would not move, just get warmer.
Conservation of momentum.
 
  • #10
Wiemster said:
The obvious objection to the famous thought experiment with one of a twins moving away from the Earth is, couldn't you have moved the twin together with the Earth in the opposite direction to yield the opposite conclusion. Thes standard answer is that the symmetry is broken when the returning twin accelerates by returning. Moving the other twin together with the Earth and the rest of the universe is not the same thing as moving only the leaving twin.

Does this imply there is some connection between all the mass in the universe and inertia a la Mach?
Nobody seems to have noticed reference to Mach in the original question, which I assume means Mach's principle, the idea that what disitinguishes inertial particles from other particles is somehow determined by all the matter in the Universe. The questioner's suggestion is that if there were only two twins in the Universe and nothing else, we wouldn't be able to say which of the two accelerated.

To mind my this is nonsense. One of the twins decides to turn round and actually does something (e.g. fire a rocket) in order to turn around. That is the twin who accelerates, and who experiences the "g-force" of acceleration. Would that g-force be absent in an empty universe? I find that hard to swallow.
 
  • #11
Wiemster said:
Well, without any other mass in the universe, the situation would be entirely symmetric and no twin can come back older than the other. Now add some mass to this universe and an asymmetry arises and there is such a thing as accelerating with respect to the background of mass in the universe. Doesn't this thought experiment clearly show the relation between inertia (as is overcome in accelerating with respect to the universe, back to earth) and the mass of the universe?

Time dilation is caused by motion relative to light. They would age differently if they moved differently. More mass is irrelevant.
 
  • #12
I would suggest that readers of this thread read the old PF thread https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=367371

In particular there have been several papers published on the topic that are mentioned in the thread:

http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0006039
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0101014 ( http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.63.044104 )

http://www.maa.org/pubs/monthly_aug_sep01_toc.html
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0101014

Talking about "Mach's principle" is a bit of a dead end, unless you happen to believe in it. Unfortunatlely, it turns out that "Mach's principle" does not actually have an operationally well-defined meaning, so it tends to cause long and pointless arguments by people who may not even realize they aren't arguing about the same thing (but are using the same words, an example of the equivocaton fallacy).

Note that GR may or may not be compatible with "Mach's principle" depending on exactly what one thinks the principle is.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #13
phyti,
Time dilation is caused by motion relative to light.
What ? I think not.
 
  • #14
Mentz114 said:
phyti,

What ? I think not.

Check the equation, it's a function of v and c!

Check the light clock, it's the same!
 
  • #15
Hello phyti.

c is constsnt so if you regard it as a function It is a constant function of c.

Matheinste.
 
  • #16
phyti said:
Check the equation, it's a function of v and c!

Check the light clock, it's the same!

'Motion relative to light' is not a definable thing. What you mean is that the magnitude of the time dilation includes c as a constant.
 

1. What is the twin paradox in an empty universe?

The twin paradox in an empty universe is a thought experiment in physics that explores the effects of time dilation and special relativity on a pair of twins. It involves one twin traveling at high speeds through an empty universe and the other twin remaining stationary. When the traveling twin returns, they will have aged less than the stationary twin due to the effects of time dilation.

2. How does special relativity play a role in the twin paradox?

Special relativity states that the laws of physics are the same for all observers in uniform motion. This means that the twin who is traveling at high speeds will experience time dilation, which is the slowing down of time. This is due to the fact that the speed of light is constant in all inertial frames of reference, and as the traveling twin approaches the speed of light, time for them will slow down relative to the stationary twin.

3. Why is the universe described as "empty" in this thought experiment?

The use of the term "empty" in this thought experiment refers to the fact that there are no other objects or sources of gravity in the universe besides the two twins. This allows for a simplified scenario where the effects of time dilation can be observed without any other external factors influencing the experiment.

4. Can the twin paradox occur in a universe with objects and sources of gravity?

Yes, the twin paradox can occur in a universe with objects and sources of gravity, but it becomes more complex. The presence of gravity can affect the acceleration and velocity of the traveling twin, which in turn affects the amount of time dilation experienced. Additionally, the presence of objects and sources of gravity can also cause changes in the geometry of space-time, which can further impact the experiment.

5. Is the twin paradox a real phenomenon or just a thought experiment?

The twin paradox is a real phenomenon that has been observed and confirmed through experiments with atomic clocks on planes and satellites. It is a consequence of the principles of special relativity and time dilation, which have been extensively tested and proven to be accurate. However, the thought experiment of the twin paradox allows for a simplified scenario to understand and demonstrate these principles without the complexities of real-world factors.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
888
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
8
Replies
254
Views
14K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
85
Views
5K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
24
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
37
Views
2K
Back
Top