1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Twin paradox with acceleration

  1. Apr 30, 2015 #1
    A spaceship leaves earth. One twin stays back, the other is on the ship. The ship accelerates for 5 years with a constant acceleration (the 5 years are in the reference frame of the ship), then it decelerates for 5 years. Then, it turns around and does the same thing again. All the accelerations and decelerations are at the same rate. When he returns, he is 40 years old. How old is the twin who stayed on Earth?


    I know the following equations that could be relevant:
    a = (1-v2/c2)3/2/(1+v*u/c2)*a'
    Where a is the acceleration in the resting frame, a' in the moving frame, v is the velocity of the frame that is moving, and u is the velocity of the object moving within the moving frame.
    Also, time dilatation formula.



    I know how to solve the normal twin paradox with time dilatation. Here, I assume that I should use the acceleration formula above somehow. However, I am at a loss at how. I do not know any velocities. Also, even if I could for example calculate a, I don't see how it would help. I could get gamma from it I guess, but for that I would already need gamma before, so it would be a bit redundant.

    I see that if I solve the problem for one step (one acceleration or deceleration), I am done, since it is symmetric though.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. May 1, 2015 #2

    PeroK

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Are you sure you have all the information? If the acceleration is small, so that speeds are non-relativistic, then the twins would be approximately the same age.
     
  4. May 1, 2015 #3
    Yes, that is all the information given. I am assuming that they travel at relativistic speeds, since our problem sets for the last 2 weeks were on this topic, and the course is a 2nd year theoretical physics class, so I think the non-relativistic case would be silly to ask for. (Yes, the problem statements are often set terribly and there is implicit information like that you should consider relativistic speeds and alike...)
     
  5. May 1, 2015 #4

    PeroK

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Okay, but that's not the point. The point is that the time dilation will depend on the velocity attained, which depends on the acceleration. If the acceleration is low, time dilation will be small, and if it's high enough, time dilation could be very great indeed.

    Alternatively, your answer will be a function of ##a##, the acceleration in the reference frame of the ship.
     
  6. May 1, 2015 #5
    Okay, so I was now confused too and checked the problem statement again. Turns out, they changed the problem statement about an hour ago, now stating the acceleration a' in the ships frame of reference is: a'=30 m/s^2. This seems to me like a large enough acceleration to cause some time dilatation over time.

    My idea right now is to write v'(t) as a function of a' (v'=a'*t), and then plug this into the formula for the acceleration that I gave before. Then I'd have a time dependent acceleration of the ship in the Earths frame of reference. Does this sound about right?

    I don't see, however, how I would then get to the velocity of the ship in the resting frame in order to get some gamma out of that...
     
  7. May 1, 2015 #6

    PeroK

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Try to get a formula for v in terms of a' and t.

    You can get a formula relating t and ##\tau## the ship's proper time from that.
     
    Last edited: May 1, 2015
  8. May 1, 2015 #7
    Thanks a lot, I was able to solve it now!
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Twin paradox with acceleration
  1. Twin Paradox (Replies: 39)

  2. Twin Paradox (Replies: 7)

  3. Twin Paradox (Replies: 3)

  4. Twins paradox (Replies: 1)

  5. Twin paradox (Replies: 1)

Loading...