Hi, India rarely helps scientific advancement. Recently this country has made some wonderful advances in the field of missile technology and information technoloy. Their recognition has become strong now. Indians are now more popular in American due to outsourcing issue. Similarly some scientists are also entring the field of physics either to disturb the present systems of working or to add some new theory. One Dr Raj Baldev from India, so known as Indian Cosmo Theorist, as I have observed from different articles about him, has introduced a new theory named Two Big Bangs through his book Two Big Bangs created the Universe. How far he is correct, I can't give my confirmed opinion at this stage, even though I read the book I borrowed from my American friend Mr. Richardson, who visited India early this month. I have some confusion about this book, it has new names, new phrases and new approach. Still I tried to contact someone to give me some help but Indiaexpress.com whom I sent e mails, did not give me the correct e mail of Dr Raj. To day I found his name and his theory being discussed in the physics forum. I am glad I got it. Instead of following the people, I give my own title. One thing I am serious about. This new theory of Dr. Raj Baldev is a punch to all other theories so far I read, may be string, everything or big bang. I am 85% convinced just some recents findings do collaborate with those of Dr. Raj. But I am confused by about 15% when he starts from the spirit. His point of forming the spaceless plateform makes good sense for some Copaf term to spin. Still, some points need clarification. However, the theory has a weight and it is for the scientific people to make use of it or not. I feel if Dr Raj Baldev had made one or two points of spirit and copaf clearer, it would have been wonderful. Nevertheless, his efforts are magnificient in the field of science. Before some one replies to me, I wish Dr Raj Baldev should make the theory more simple on the forum on two points of spirit and copaf for the ordinary reader and for the scientists. It is new theory even for them, they need time and simple way to shed the old and to follow the new. Other points are wonderfully explained and I doubt whether some scientist can easily beat his initiative. I wish him the best of luck and expect of him to make the things clearer if my message reaches him either through the forum or through e mail or through new writings.