• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

Two boxes

  • Thread starter Firben
  • Start date
  • #1
145
0
The problem:

You are lowering two boxes, one on top of the other, down the ramp shown in Figure 5.53 by pulling on a rope parallel to the surface of the ramp. Both boxes move together at a constant speed of 15.0 cm/s. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the ramp and the lower box is 0.444, and the coefficient of static friction between the two boxes is 0.800. (a) What force do you need to exert to accomplish this? (b) What are the magnitude and direction of the friction force on the upper box?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/53947633@N06/4988606991/


Equations

(2)w = mg
(1)F = uk(m1+m2)g+us*m2g

Solution:

Well i added the two boxes masses to 80 kg and i got the angle to be 27.7 degrees
(1)w = m(tot)*g = 784,8 N

(2)F = uk(m1+m2)g +us*m2*g <==>

F = 599.4 N

The answer should be 57.1 N
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
92
0
You are approaching the problem in the wrong way I think. Try resolving the forces in the problem into their components perpendicular and parallel to the plane, which would make life a lot easier for you.
 
  • #3
gneill
Mentor
20,792
2,770
The crates are on a slope, so the forces will have components that are normal to the surface and parallel to the surface. Your force due to friction with the ramp, for example, depends upon the component of the total weight that is perpendicular to (normal to) the ramp.
 
  • #4
145
0
ƩFy = g(m1+m2)sinα

ƩFx = μk(m1+m2)g*sinα

F = (m1+m2)g(sinα-μkcosα)

Is this right ?

How can i find magnitude and direction of the friction force on the upper box ?
 
  • #5
92
0
The trig isn't correct, try drawing a free body diagram, it always helps.

You have the frictional force, Fr, which is equal to μN, where N is the force normal to the plane, you have the force parallel to the plane due to the weight of the mass(es) and you have the force of the man pulling on the rope. The boxes are moving at a constant velocity, therefore forces up the plane must equal forces down the plane.
 
  • #6
145
0
I have plotted a free-body diagram, but how do i know which equation i should use ?

ƩFx = Tcos27.7 (-fk)

ƩFy = Tsin27.7 + n +(-w)
 
Last edited:
  • #7
92
0
Like I said, calculate the forces in the problem, from that, you should know which forces act up or down the plane, then equate them.
 
  • #8
gneill
Mentor
20,792
2,770
The trig isn't correct, try drawing a free body diagram, it always helps.

You have the frictional force, Fr, which is equal to μN, where N is the force normal to the plane, you have the force parallel to the plane due to the weight of the mass(es) and you have the force of the man pulling on the rope. The boxes are moving at a constant velocity, therefore forces up the plane must equal forces down the plane.
attachment.php?attachmentid=41102&stc=1&d=1321888834.jpg


I think his trig looks fine. Where do you see a problem?
 

Attachments

  • #9
145
0
Is
ƩFy = g(m1+m2)sinα

ƩFx = μk(m1+m2)g*sinα

F = (m1+m2)g(sinα-μkcosα)

the right way ?

For the upper box:

ƩFx = Tcos27.7 + (-fk) = 0 <==> Tcos27.7 = μkn

ƩFy = Tsin27.7 + n +(-w) = 0 <==> n=w-Tsin27.7
 
  • #10
gneill
Mentor
20,792
2,770
Is
ƩFy = g(m1+m2)sinα

ƩFx = μk(m1+m2)g*sinα

F = (m1+m2)g(sinα-μkcosα)

the right way ?
That looks fine. What answer does it give for F?
For the upper box:

ƩFx = Tcos27.7 + (-fk) = 0 <==> Tcos27.7 = μkn

ƩFy = Tsin27.7 + n +(-w) = 0 <==> n=w-Tsin27.7
For the upper box you won't know what the actual friction force is until you calculate the downslope component of the box's weight and compare it to the maximum static friction. This maximum is calculated just like for static friction: find the normal force and multiply by μs. What happens if the downslope component of the weight exceeds this maximum value?
 
  • #11
145
0
I got F to be 56,39 N

fs = μn
w1 = 470.88 N

w*cosα*μs = 555,8 N tot (both boxes)

w1*cosα*μs = 222.3 N (upper box)

what am I doing wrong here ?
 
  • #12
gneill
Mentor
20,792
2,770
I got F to be 56,39 N
That's just a little low. Are you carrying enough decimal places through your intermediate steps?
fs = μn
w1 = 470.88 N

w*cosα*μs = 555,8 N tot (both boxes)

w1*cosα*μs = 222.3 N (upper box)

what am I doing wrong here ?
Only the weight of the upper box is pressing down on the lower box. The lower box is only providing the surface. What's the weight of the top box? What's the normal component?
 
  • #13
145
0
F = (m1+m2)g(sinα-μkcosα) <==>

F = (32+48)9.81*(sin27.7-0.4444cos27.7) = 56

The upper box:

313.92*cos27.7 * 0.800 = 222.3 N
 
  • #14
gneill
Mentor
20,792
2,770
F = (m1+m2)g(sinα-μkcosα) <==>

F = (32+48)9.81*(sin27.7-0.4444cos27.7) = 56
Keep a couple more decimal places in angle value: 27.759°
The upper box:

313.92*cos27.7 * 0.800 = 222.3 N
Okay, that's the maximum value that static friction can be. Now, what's the downslope component of the upper box's weight?
 
  • #15
145
0
Im not sure

But is it

ƩFy = wCosα ?
 
  • #16
gneill
Mentor
20,792
2,770
Im not sure

But is it

ƩFy = wCosα ?
No, that's the normal component (that you just used to find the maximum friction). What's the component along the slope?
 
  • #17
145
0
Is it
w*sinα <=>

313.92*sin(27.7) = 145.9 ~146 N
 
  • #18
gneill
Mentor
20,792
2,770
Is it
w*sinα <=>

313.92*sin(27.7) = 145.9 ~146 N
Yes it is.

Again, you should keep additional digits in your angle value. This will prevent rounding errors interfering with your results.
 
  • #19
92
0
attachment.php?attachmentid=41102&stc=1&d=1321888834.jpg


I think his trig looks fine. Where do you see a problem?

ƩFy = g(m1+m2)sinα
Forgive me if I'm being blatently dumb, but shouldn't that be cosine, and not sine?
 
  • #20
gneill
Mentor
20,792
2,770
Forgive me if I'm being blatently dumb, but shouldn't that be cosine, and not sine?
Yes, well, it looks like he made a typo in that particular line. Note that he wrote the correct expression for the force directly below:
ƩFy = g(m1+m2)sinα

ƩFx = μk(m1+m2)g*sinα

F = (m1+m2)g(sinα-μkcosα) <-------
which was the point of the exercise.
 
  • #21
92
0
I agree with that, but he corrected the expression in the post after mine, which I was offline for. Just covering my back here.
 

Related Threads on Two boxes

  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
919
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
559
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
5K
Top