Two categories of intelligence

  • Thread starter Bartholomew
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Intelligence
In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of dividing intelligence into two categories: "sufficient" and "extra." Sufficient intelligence refers to the level needed to solve a problem using normal reasoning, while extra intelligence includes special talents and abilities such as speed and insight. Sufficient intelligence is measured by how close one is to perfection, while extra intelligence is measured by specific abilities. The analogy of a universal computer is used to explain the difference between the two types of intelligence. The conversation ends with a poll about being part man, part computer or a "conscious" robot.
  • #1
Bartholomew
527
0
I propose dividing intelligence into two categories: "sufficient" intelligence, and "extra" intelligence. Sufficient intelligence would be intelligence that you need to solve a problem correctly, so long as it can be solved by applying normal reasoning. Extra intelligence would be "flashy" stuff--speed of thought, special talents like music or athletics.

Sufficient intelligence would be measured in terms of defects--how far short of perfect do you fall. Extra intelligence would be measured however it is reasonable to measure it--speed would be measured with a speed measurement. Someone with perfect sufficient intelligence would perform every mental task flawlessly, though he might take a long time and he might not be very insightful. There's no such thing as "perfect" extra intelligence, but someone with high extra intelligence might do things quickly or with insight. There can be many kinds of extra intelligence.

It's like the idea of a universal computer. A universal computer must be capable of performing all logic functions flawlessly, and it must have an unlimited memory to store results in. This is sufficient intelligence: the ability to grasp concepts, the ability to remember concepts, the ability to work with concepts correctly. Extra intelligence is: do you have an MMX instruction set? What's your clock speed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Quick poll: If you could be part man, part computer, would you do it?

better yet, who would like to be a "conscious" robot?
 
  • #3


I find your proposal of dividing intelligence into two categories, "sufficient" and "extra," intriguing. It brings to mind the concept of "good enough" versus "exceptional." However, I do have some concerns about this categorization.

First, I think it may be difficult to draw a clear line between what would be considered "sufficient" and "extra" intelligence. What may be considered sufficient for one task or problem may be considered extra for another. For example, a person may have sufficient intelligence to solve a complex math problem, but may not possess extra intelligence in the form of musical talent. This could lead to a subjective and potentially arbitrary categorization of intelligence.

Second, I am not sure if measuring intelligence in terms of defects is the most accurate or fair way to assess it. It seems to suggest that there is a "perfect" level of intelligence that one should strive for, which may not be realistic or even desirable. Additionally, it may not take into account the different ways in which individuals may excel or struggle in different areas, making it difficult to accurately measure intelligence in this way.

Finally, I am not sure if your comparison to a universal computer is entirely applicable to human intelligence. While a computer may have a set of specific functions and capabilities, human intelligence is much more complex and multifaceted. It may be difficult to quantify or measure all the different forms of extra intelligence that you mention.

Overall, while your proposal raises interesting points about the different aspects of intelligence, I think it may be challenging to implement in a practical and fair way. Perhaps a more comprehensive and nuanced approach to understanding and measuring intelligence would be more beneficial.
 

1. What are the two categories of intelligence?

The two categories of intelligence are fluid intelligence and crystallized intelligence. Fluid intelligence refers to the ability to think abstractly and solve new problems, while crystallized intelligence refers to the accumulation of knowledge and skills through experience and education.

2. Can one category of intelligence be more important than the other?

Both fluid and crystallized intelligence are important and work together to support cognitive functioning. However, the importance of each category may vary depending on the task at hand. For example, fluid intelligence may be more important for solving novel problems, while crystallized intelligence may be more important for tasks that require prior knowledge and experience.

3. Is intelligence solely determined by genetics?

No, intelligence is influenced by a combination of genetic and environmental factors. While genetics play a role in determining one's potential for intelligence, environmental factors such as education, nutrition, and experiences also play a significant role in shaping intelligence.

4. Can intelligence be improved?

Yes, intelligence can be improved through various means such as education, training, and challenging oneself with new and complex tasks. These activities can help to strengthen neural connections and improve cognitive abilities.

5. Are there any differences in intelligence between genders?

There is no conclusive evidence to suggest that one gender has a higher level of intelligence than the other. While there may be slight differences in certain areas, overall there is no significant difference in intelligence between males and females.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
5
Views
828
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • General Discussion
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
585
  • General Discussion
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
34
Views
9K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top