1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Two Offset Slits

  1. Aug 31, 2013 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Consider the above setup, not drawn to scale.

    Light of wavelength λ= 475 nm strikes the first screen with slit A.
    The second screen, x1 = 0.7 meters behind the first screen, has two slits, B and C .
    The third screen is x2 = 1.5 meters behind the second screen. It has slit O, which is level with slit A. A lightmeter measures the light intensity at the slit O.

    When light is sent through slit A and measured at the slit O with either slit B or slit C open one slit at a time, the intensity at the point O is the same: I0 = 0.5 W/m2. (The slit widths can always be adjusted so that this is true, but for this problem you can/should ignore the width of all slits.)

    Slit B is at height y1 = 2 mm above slit A.

    Slit C is at height y2 = 1 mm above slit A.

    Note that the drawing is not drawn to scale.

    1) What is the light intensity measured at the point O when both slits B and C are open?
    I =?

    OffsetSlits.gif


    2. Relevant equations

    sin(theta)=(n*lamda)/(d)
    Law of cosine
    3. The attempt at a solution

    I believe that the light enters B and C is out of phase. I tried to find delta using the Pythagorean theorem and got 3.14e-6. Then I used 2*pi*delta/lamba to get what i thought would be phi. Then i did 4*.5*cos^2(phi/2)...but that didn't work. I got something around .256 but that was incorrect
     
    Last edited: Aug 31, 2013
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 31, 2013 #2

    TSny

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    I think you have the right approach. I'm not getting the same value for the the path difference between path ABO and path ACO. {EDIT: Nevermind! I agree with your value for delta.}
     
    Last edited: Aug 31, 2013
  4. Aug 31, 2013 #3

    TSny

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    I get .253 W/m2 which is very close to your answer.
     
  5. Aug 31, 2013 #4
    I tried that as well, so only quote unquote hint I get is :
    "Note that the waves coming to slits B and C are NOT necessarily in phase with each other. You can either take this into account explicitly, or note that all rays that pass through O also pass through A, and the upper-path and lower-path rays ARE in phase at A. You will need to carry out your calculations carefully, keeping many decimal points. How many? The answer needs to be good to within 1%. How accurately does phi need to be specified? And how accurately then does the path length difference need to be specified, and how many decimal places out of the total path length is this? Make sure you keep track of units!"

    I have not been rounding anything in my calculations. My calculator gives me about 10 spots/places after the decimal place...
     
  6. Aug 31, 2013 #5
    Oh wait, I just got an email from my professor saying the system is having issues with presicion...so i guess i'll wait a little while until it is back up to continue (maybe i actually have the right answer)
     
  7. Aug 31, 2013 #6

    TSny

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    OK. Now I'm getting .256 in agreement with you. Good.
     
  8. Sep 2, 2013 #7
    So apparently the .256 is not correct, but one of the random answers i put earlier .23305 is correct. Although i'm not sure how i got that.
     
  9. Sep 2, 2013 #8

    TSny

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Interesting. I don't see why your answer isn't correct. I'll try to get some of the other helpers around here to look at it.
     
  10. Sep 2, 2013 #9

    mfb

    User Avatar
    2016 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    With a taylor approximation to second and third order, I can confirm .25627 W.
    Using only first order, I get 0.25632 W. To get a wrong answer of .23305, you need some significant rounding errors.
     
  11. Sep 3, 2013 #10
    Thank you guys so much. It turns out that .2563 is correct (there was just apparently a lot of issues with the online system)
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Two Offset Slits
  1. Two slits (Replies: 3)

Loading...