Two statements about limits

  • Thread starter vbplaya
  • Start date
  • #1
vbplaya
11
0
Hey, I just need help with these two statements about limits which happens to be my least favorite topic of calculus. I just need to know if they are true or false and why.

If lim x→c =L, then f(c) = L.

I don't think that is true because f(c) may not always equal L? or is the statement true? I'm not sure


Also:
If f(x) < g(x) for all x≠a, then lim x→a f(x) < lim x→a g(x)

I'm not sure about this one either. I know that if f(x)=g(x) for all x≠c in an open interval containing c, and their limits exists, then lim x→c f(x) = lim x→c g(x). But I don't know if it's is the same for this inequality.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
seang
184
0
I think they're both correct. I'm no master with limits either. They are an awkward concept to grasp, but you should take time and fight the repulsion, because limits are the foundation of calculus. You'll be able to solve run of the mill problems without them, but in order to really understand what's going on, you've got to try to understand them.

That said, I didn't really understand them until the second half of calc 2 heh.
 
  • #3
bomba923
760
0
vbplaya said:
Hey, I just need help with these two statements about limits which happens to be my least favorite topic of calculus. I just need to know if they are true or false and why.

If lim x→c =L, then f(c) = L.

I don't think that is true because f(c) may not always equal L? or is the statement true? I'm not sure


Also:
If f(x) < g(x) for all x≠a, then lim x→a f(x) < lim x→a g(x)

I'm not sure about this one either. I know that if f(x)=g(x) for all x≠c in an open interval containing c, and their limits exists, then lim x→c f(x) = lim x→c g(x). But I don't know if it's is the same for this inequality.

Both of your statements are false.

*Statement #1 counterexample:
[tex] \text{Let} \; f ( x ) = \frac{{x^2 + x - 6}}{{x - 2}} [/tex]
Then,
[tex] \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to 2} f\left( x \right) = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to 2} \frac{{x^2 + x - 6}}{{x - 2}} = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to 2} x + 3 = 5 [/tex]

but the removable discontinuity
[tex] f\left( 2 \right){\text{ does not exist}}{\text{.}} [/tex]

*Statement #2 counterexample:
[tex] {\text{Let }}f\left( x \right) = 2x - 1\;{\text{and }}g\left( x \right) = x^2 [/tex]

Which satisfies [itex] \forall x \ne 1,\;f\left( x \right) < g\left( x \right) [/itex]

But,
[tex] \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to 1} f\left( x \right) = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to 1} g\left( x \right) = 1 [/tex]

and [itex] 1 =1 [/itex] :biggrin:
 
Last edited:

Suggested for: Two statements about limits

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
329
Replies
20
Views
669
Replies
7
Views
478
  • Last Post
Replies
18
Views
687
Replies
2
Views
451
Replies
3
Views
377
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
841
Top