Types of Radioactive decay

  • Thread starter vee-bee
  • Start date
1
0
How are Madame Curie's notebooks still radioactively dangerous when Hiroshima is not?
 

Astronuc

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
18,551
1,682
How are Madame Curie's notebooks still radioactively dangerous when Hiroshima is not?
The explosion at Hiroshima was an airburst, some much of the U-235 and fission products were vaporized in the atmosphere, and they would have drifted away to the ocean. Much of the contaminated areas were exposed to rain, so the rain would wash away the debris. Otherwise the debris would have been buried or moved to some other area. Likely most radionuclides formed from neutron absorption would have been short-lived and would have decayed by now.

The notebook probably was contiminated with dust or solution. And she was working with radium and polonium, and possibly actinides, which would have long half-lives.

How does one know that Madame Curie's notebooks are still radioactively dangerous? What is the activity from them?
 

Related Threads for: Types of Radioactive decay

Replies
6
Views
948
  • Posted
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Posted
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
648
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
539
Replies
4
Views
949
  • Posted
Replies
4
Views
8K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top