On page 172 he writes(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex] G_{ab} - \Lambda g_{ab} = 8 \pi T_{ab}~~~(13.5) [/tex]

Using the results of section 11.3..the corresponding Lagrangian is

[tex] {\cal L} = \sqrt{-g} (R - 2 \Lambda) + {\cal L}_M [/tex]

But the sign of the Lambda term in the Lagrangian is wrong, it seems to me.

In section 11.3 he shows that

[tex] \frac{\delta (R \sqrt{-g})}{\delta g_{ab}} = - \sqrt{-g} G^{ab} [/tex]

and

[tex] \frac{\delta ( \sqrt{-g})}{\delta g_{ab}} = \frac{1}{2} \sqrt{-g} g^{ab} [/tex]

However, the signs are switched in both equations if we do the variation with respect to [tex]g^{ab} [/tex]:

[tex] \frac{\delta (R \sqrt{-g})}{\delta g^{ab}} = + \sqrt{-g} G_{ab} [/tex]

and

[tex] \frac{\delta ( \sqrt{-g})}{\delta g^{ab}} = - \frac{1}{2} \sqrt{-g} g_{ab} [/tex]

So the Lagrangian he wrote does not lead to the equation he gave because the Lambda term will acquire a minus sign.

Can someone tell me if I am missing something?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Typo in d'Inverno?

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**