The integral:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[itex]\int[/itex]d[itex]^{3}k[/itex][itex]\frac{1}{k^{2}+m^{2}}[/itex]

is linearly divergent i.e. ultraviolet divergent.

However, If one performs dimensional regularization to the above integral:

[itex]\frac{1}{(2\pi)^d}[/itex][itex]\int[/itex]d[itex]^{d}k[/itex][itex]\frac{1}{k^{2}+m^{2}}[/itex]=[itex]\frac{(m^{2})^{d/2-1}}{(4\pi)^{d/2}}[/itex][itex]\Gamma(1-d/2)[/itex]

As you can notice that the poles of the Gamma function are for even dimension i.e. d=2,4,6..etc and that the integral is convergent for d=3 for example!!!

What is the reason behind this convergence? Is it due to the Veltman's formula:

[itex]\frac{1}{(2\pi)^d}[/itex][itex]\int[/itex]d[itex]^{d}k[/itex][itex] (k^{2})^{n-1}[/itex] = 0, for n=0,1,2,..

I am dealing with a divergent integral of power divergence (ultraviolet, quadratic, quartic,... and no logarithmic divergence). Do you advise me to use dimensional regularization or other methods?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Ultraviolet via dimensional regularization

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Ultraviolet dimensional regularization | Date |
---|---|

A Renormalisation: what are the physical observables? | Mar 2, 2018 |

A Dimensional Regularization of Feynman Integrals | Apr 28, 2017 |

I Tensor integrals in dimensional regularisation | Mar 4, 2017 |

A Dimensional regularization | Feb 16, 2017 |

A Dimensional Transmutation | Oct 10, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**