Should Cloning Research Be Banned Worldwide?

  • Thread starter Zantra
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Cloning
In summary, the United States, Costa Rica, Italy and anti-abortion groups argued that this type of research, for whatever purpose, constitutes the taking of human lives. However, many scientists backed by governments, including Belgium, Britain, Singapore and China, say the technique offers hope for a cure to some 100 million people with such conditions as Alzheimer's, cancer, diabetes and spinal cord injuries.
  • #1
Zantra
793
3
http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/science/03/08/cloning.un.reut/index.html

Bush is at it again...

Many scientists, backed by governments including Belgium, Britain, Singapore and China, say the technique offers hope for a cure to some 100 million people with such conditions as Alzheimer's, cancer, diabetes and spinal cord injuries.

But the United States, Costa Rica, Italy and anti-abortion groups argued that this type of research, for whatever purpose, constitutes the taking of human lives.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
No way! I think a ban on reproductive cloning is right, but a ban on therapeutic cloning (to create stem cells)?
 
  • #3
Would you say America would not be so 'objective' of cloning if it weren't for Goerge bush?
 
  • #4
It must suck for scientists to put up with this ****. They have been putting up with it for 1000's of years, and yet brought so much to the world. Even so, they still give them **** everyday.

People say "Thank God!", but did they ever think of thanking scientists?
 
  • #5
Zantra said:
Bush is at it again...

That article didn't make much of a reference to Bush. It was his administration that initially attempted to broaden the ban on human cloning several years ago, but this proposal for passed by 84 nations, mostly nations that are staunchly Catholic, in support of Pope John Paul II's call for a ban on all cloning.
 
  • #6
Thank God. Could you imagine what the population would be if scientist were allowed to figure out cures to all of these diseases.
 
  • #7
mattmns said:
Thank God. Could you imagine what the population would be if scientist were allowed to figure out cures to all of these diseases.
True we don't need more people living longer and longer, but it would be nice if all these people who are living longer were living healthier. (I'm thinking quality of life, not to mention rising medical/insurance costs.)

As for the fundamentalists, it seems we are going back into the Dark Ages (religion always trys to thwart science, because religion thrives on ignorance). Wasn't everyone making a big deal about organ donors/replacement etc. not long ago...? I guess there will be a battle over every new discovery.
 

1. What does the UN vote for ban on cloning mean?

The UN vote for ban on cloning refers to the decision made by the United Nations to prohibit the practice of human cloning worldwide. This vote is a result of concerns about the ethical and moral implications of cloning on individuals and society as a whole.

2. Is all cloning banned by the UN vote?

The UN vote for ban on cloning specifically pertains to human cloning. Other forms of cloning, such as cloning of animals or plants, are not currently banned by the UN. However, individual countries may have their own laws and regulations regarding cloning.

3. Why is there a need for a ban on cloning?

The ban on cloning is necessary due to the potential risks and ethical concerns associated with human cloning. It raises questions about human rights, exploitation, and the potential for creating genetically modified individuals without their consent.

4. What are the implications of the UN vote for ban on cloning?

The UN vote for ban on cloning has significant implications for the future of scientific research and medical advancements. It may limit the ability of scientists to study human cloning and its potential benefits, but it also protects individuals from potential harm and exploitation.

5. Can the UN vote for ban on cloning be reversed?

The UN vote for ban on cloning can be reversed if there is a change in the beliefs and values of the UN member states. However, this would require a new vote and significant evidence and arguments in favor of lifting the ban on human cloning.

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top