Hi,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I'm puzzled by a couple of formulae in the answer sheet to a problem set I'm working on.

To calc. the new uncertainty in the position of a group of electrons, initially localised to [tex]\pm1\mum[/tex], after time t, it uses the factor:

[tex]\left(1+\frac{\hbar^{2}(\Delta k^{4}t^{2})}{4m^{2}}\right)^{1/2}[/tex]

The equation I would use for the probability density of this wave is

[tex]

\left|\Psi(z,t)\right|^{2} = \frac{\pi.(\Delta k^{2})}{\left(1+\frac{\hbar^{2}(\Delta k^{4}t^{2})}{4m^{2}}\right)^{1/2}}.exp\left(\frac{(\Delta k^{2})(z-vt)^{2}}{2\left(1+\frac{\hbar^{2}(\Delta k^{4}t^{2})}{4m^{2}}\right)}\right)

[/tex]

The denominator of the exp. component describes the increasing width of the wave packet (whereas [tex]\left(1+\frac{\hbar^{2}(\Delta k^{4}t^{2})}{4m^{2}}\right)^{1/2}[/tex] describes the decreasing peak height). I am puzzled by the square root sign they've introduced. Shouldn't they have simply applied it without?

Clearly, one needs to calc. [tex]\Delta k[/tex] to determine the new uncertainty in position, but I'm also puzzled by the claim that [tex]\Delta p\Delta z \approx \sqrt{2}[/tex] (nowhere justified). How do they figure that one?

Cheers!

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Homework Help: Uncertainty in the wavepacket

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**