Understanding Nuclear Medicine: Benefits & Uses

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of nuclear medicine, its applications, and career paths associated with it. Participants explore the definitions, technologies involved, and educational requirements for working in the field, including distinctions between nuclear medicine and other imaging technologies like MRI and CT scans.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about the term "nuclear medicine," questioning whether it refers to the design of imaging machines or radiation-based treatments.
  • One participant clarifies that MRI machines are not considered "nuclear machines" and emphasize that nuclear medicine primarily involves radiation therapy.
  • Another participant discusses the use of radioactive isotopes in nuclear medicine for imaging specific organs, highlighting techniques like PET scanning.
  • Concerns are raised about the job market for nuclear engineering and the educational paths required for careers in nuclear medicine, including whether medical school is necessary.
  • Some participants suggest contacting firms that manufacture imaging instruments to better understand industry needs.
  • There is a discussion about the differences in educational requirements for nuclear medicine technologists versus physicians interpreting nuclear medicine studies, with varying salary expectations mentioned.
  • One participant provides historical context regarding the naming of MRI, suggesting it was renamed to avoid the term "nuclear" due to patient concerns.
  • Technical discussions arise regarding the principles of MRI, including the role of magnetic fields and superconductivity, with some participants seeking clarification on these concepts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the definition of nuclear medicine or its distinction from other imaging technologies. There are conflicting views on the educational requirements and career paths within the field, with some participants advocating for further exploration of the topic through direct engagement with professionals in the field.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about educational paths and career outcomes in nuclear medicine, as well as the definitions of nuclear medicine versus other imaging modalities. Some technical explanations remain unresolved, particularly concerning the specifics of MRI technology and its relation to nuclear principles.

dreiter
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
I have heard this title bandied around now for awhile, and I'm still not quite sure what it means? Would this be designing/building/maintaining 'nuclear' machines such as MRI/CT machines, or would this be radiation based treatments for diseases, or would this be (insert job description here)?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Hi there,

dreiter said:
'nuclear' machines such as MRI/CT machines

MRIs are not "nuclear machines". They are calle Magnetic Resonance Imagery for a reason, because they don not use any nuclear technology.

The term nuclear medicine implies radiation therapy, essentially. Your function will vary essentially according to your level of education. But, the term nuclear medicine does not refer to the design, construction, nor maintenance of the nuclear instruments. It only refers to the use of these instruments for radiation therapy.

Cheers
 
Hence my use of single quotes around the word 'nuclear'. :)

I am finishing up my B.S. in engineering physics, and I am looking into the nuclear masters program, but the job market seems uncertain (as far as working at a plant goes). Perhaps the thread should be moved because I have a new question, and that is:

What masters degree is best for working in industry designing/building new CT machines, etc.?
 
Hi there,

The best way to truly find out what the industry wants would be to get in contact with some firms that make these instruments. Send them an e-mail.

Otherwise, I would say that nuclear engineering is probably a safe bet, probably more in the field of nuclear instruments. I would say that your knowledge of nuclear physics has to be more or less deep. Your knowledge of material and interaction between radiation and matter is probably where you want to look.

Hope this helps.

Cheers
 
Nuclear Medicine is just one area of Diagnostic Imaging. They inject radioactive isotopes into the body that are specifically tagged to go to where you want them. Liver, heart stomach, bone... Then you are scanned with a gamma camera or some other type of tracer - depending upon the exam being done. Positron Emmision Tomography (PET scanning) is part of Nuc. Med. It is a very interesting imaging modality...
 
Thanks vibjwb for the link. I thought to check Wiki about an hour after I posted the topic, hehe.


I seem to get conflicting info on nuclear medicine as a career choice. Is there pre-med, med school, and a residency involved? I see that the career pays well, so I assume med school is required...
 
Hi there,

From my point of view, we gave a few ideas of what is nuclear medicine. Now, if you really want to know more about it, make an appointment with the nuclear department in your hospital. They will be able to show you around, and explain you the details of their function.

That's what I did at the time, just to find out that nuclear medicine was not my cup of tea.

Cheers
 
fatra2 said:
MRIs are not "nuclear machines". They are calle Magnetic Resonance Imagery for a reason, because they don not use any nuclear technology.

Well, actually they're called 'Magnetic Resonance Imagery' for the reason that patients didn't want to get into a big machine named 'nuclear'-anything. So they got together and decided (I think it was 1983 or thereabouts) to officially rename it 'MRI' rather than 'NMRI'. NMR machines are still named NMR though. (since test-tubes don't complain)

However I agree it doesn't use 'nuclear technology' in the popular sense and MRI wouldn't fall into the 'nuclear medicine' category.
 
  • #10
Hi there,

alxm said:
Well, actually they're called 'Magnetic Resonance Imagery' for the reason that patients didn't want to get into a big machine named 'nuclear'-anything. So they got together and decided (I think it was 1983 or thereabouts) to officially rename it 'MRI' rather than 'NMRI'. NMR machines are still named NMR though. (since test-tubes don't complain)

However I agree it doesn't use 'nuclear technology' in the popular sense and MRI wouldn't fall into the 'nuclear medicine' category.

You got me stumped with your description. From what I know, MRI are simple big "magnets" of around 1T, that interact with the magnetic particles of the body. Now, could you tell me what part of super-conductivity of a solenoid is part of nuclear.

Cheers
 
  • #11
fatra2 said:
You got me stumped with your description. From what I know, MRI are simple big "magnets" of around 1T, that interact with the magnetic particles of the body.

The 'particles' in question being the atomic nuclei that have a non-zero net magnetic moment. (notably hydrogen)

Now, could you tell me what part of super-conductivity of a solenoid is part of nuclear.

Nothing. The magnet is just there to create a field. The field's not what's being measured though. The field causes an energy level splitting (Zeeman effect) which is what the nuclei 'resonate' between. Superconductors are used because it's the only viable way to achieve field strengths of that order. It doesn't need to be a superconducting solenoid. The first NMR machine used a big permanent magnet.

It's 'nuclear' because you're measuring a property of the nuclei. Not a molecular or atomic or electronic property but a specifically nuclear one - the nuclear spin state interacts only very weakly with the electrons, and hence chemistry is unaffected and it's all an entirely noninvasive method. (which was first used for chemistry as NMR, and still is, with higher resolution machines and fields typically about 10-13T)
 
  • #12
dreiter said:
I seem to get conflicting info on nuclear medicine as a career choice. Is there pre-med, med school, and a residency involved? I see that the career pays well, so I assume med school is required...

http://perth.uwlax.edu/nmt/pdf/whatisnucmed.pdf"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #13
dreiter said:
Thanks vibjwb for the link. I thought to check Wiki about an hour after I posted the topic, hehe.


I seem to get conflicting info on nuclear medicine as a career choice. Is there pre-med, med school, and a residency involved? I see that the career pays well, so I assume med school is required...

It depends upon whether you want to be the technologist who actually performs the exam (approx. $30-$40/hr) or if you want to be the physician who interprets the exam (potentially up to $500,000/yr). Radiologists interpret Nuc.Med. studies. Radiologists are MD's who have specialized in Diagnostic Imaging. Tech school = approx. 2 yrs; Radiologist school = pre med, med school, internship and then several years of Radiology Residency. Fellowship? = more years of school.

I have been working in the field of diagnostic imaging for 35 years. I do xrays and cat scan exams, although Nuc Med is a very interesting area with PET scanning technology growing in leaps and bounds. PET scanning (positron emmision tomography) is a fascinating cross of Nuc Med and CT technology.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
20
Views
18K