This is another one of those concepts where I understand what happens at the macroscopic level, but don't understand the why, or rather what is happening at the fundamental level. Now my understanding of QM has improved a fair amount in the last week thanks to some help from ZapperZ, but I'm still having trouble moving from a relativistic understanding of the photon to a QM one. Below is a derivation of redshift based on some classical and relativistic physics:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

As per that equation, a photon leaving the surface of the sun and traveling to 1au is red-shifted to .9999978905 of its original frequency, or a change of -2.1095E-4% of the original. One could also see that a photon emitted from a singularity is red-shifted to a frequency of zero. On the extreme, a photon from the accretion disk of a black hole of 1000 solar masses from 1 earth radius moving to infinity red-shifts to .791386 or about a 21% decrease of its original wavelength. A photon falling into earth's well blue-shifts 7.058E-8% of the initial frequency, an (I should think) barley detectable amount.

- First, "the
energy carried by a photon is related to it's frequency"^{http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon#Physical_properties"}

- Second, energy is conserved. What this means, at least to my understand is that the photon must loose energy as it moves out of the potential well created by a massive object.
- From a classical perspective, gravity acts on an object's total mass? (Not sure about this one). Total mass includes relativistic mass, so if true, gravity acts on photons.
- We can derive mass of a photon from the following:

- Photons are have m
_{0}of zero and speed c- Relativistically, momentum p = m
_{0}[itex]\gamma[/itex]c and energy E = m_{T}c^{2}- m
_{0}[itex]\gamma[/itex] is total mass m_{T}, which is m_{rel}+ m_{0}. That gives us the substitution m_{T}= m_{rel}for the photon due to the identity property of addition.- a little algebra on the definitions of relativistic p and E gives
E / c = p- the above means that, for photons, energy is proportional to momentum, rather than the classical relation.
- E / c = m
_{rel}c, orE / c^{2}= m_{T}= m_{rel}- And gravity well can be approximated as F = G m
_{T}M / r^{2}- realizing that force is the change in momentum F = dp/dt; Recall that v = dr/dt,
dt/dr c = 1. dp/dt = d/dt(mc) = dm/dt c.- and recall m
_{T}= E c^{-2}- We're interested in red shift, and thus frequency. E = h [itex]\omega[/itex] / (2[itex]\pi[/itex]), m = h/(2[itex]\pi[/itex]c
^{2}) [itex]\omega[/itex], dm/dt = h/(2[itex]\pi[/itex]c^{2}) d[itex]\omega[/itex]/dt- combining: F = G m
_{T}M / r^{2}->

([STRIKE]c[/STRIKE])( [STRIKE]h/(2[itex]\pi[/itex][/STRIKE][STRIKE]c^{2}[/STRIKE]) d[itex]\omega[/itex]/[STRIKE]dt[/STRIKE] ) ([STRIKE]dt[/STRIKE]/dr [STRIKE]c[/STRIKE]) = (G M / r^{2}) ([STRIKE]h/(2[itex]\pi[/itex][/STRIKE]c^{2}) [itex]\omega[/itex]) ->

d[itex]\omega[/itex]/dr - [itex]\omega[/itex] GMr^{-2}c^{-2}= 0- Solving the differential:
[itex]\omega[/itex] = [itex]\omega[/itex]_{0}e^{GM/c2(1/r-1/r0)}

So, are my results correct, and how would one do the equivalent from the quantum perspective, using the wave-function model for light?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Understanding Red Shift

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**