i have been trying to obtain a schema for the Born rule and have got to this result.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The incidence of detection at a point (x,t) = the incidence of the particle being at point (x,t) multiplied by the incidence of the detector being at point (x,t) on detection. The incidence of the second term is proportional to the probability of the the particle being at (x,t). Is this justifiable?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I Understanding the Born rule

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Understanding Born rule | Date |
---|---|

B Am I understanding the intepretations correctly? | Jan 12, 2018 |

B Understanding Bell’s inequality | Jan 6, 2018 |

I Trouble understanding the idea of a cavity radiator being a Black Body | Dec 28, 2017 |

I Understanding the no-clone theorem | Dec 7, 2017 |

Understanding the Born Rule | Feb 8, 2014 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**