"Unexplaining" global warming Realclimate is an initiative of concerned climatologists who may seem to fear that the global warming message is waning. I tested the objectivity of the place by applying the next comment: Obviously, the comment was not honored. Anyway, to anybody objectively interested in the power of fallacies, I could recommend studying this site. More worrying is the question why it is necesary to revert to a deluge of fallacies. One obvious problem is that practice and preached do not match and it appears that the evidence for Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) seems to problematic. Now suppose that AGW is not true, how could it happen that so many people and many scientists are convinced that it is true. Is it a conspiracy? How did it happen. How can we explain the deep rooted belief in it and how can we "unexplain" global warming. That's the objective of this thread.