Unique factorization domain

In summary, the conversation discusses the proof that \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{5}) is a UFD. The proof involves showing that for any element a + b\sqrt{5} \in \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{5}), there are two distinct prime factorizations and showing that they differ by a unit. It is mentioned that this proof follows a similar method as the proof of the fundamental theorem of arithmetic. The uniqueness part of the proof is important and it is noted that it suffices to show this for integers. The conversation also discusses the condition that gcd(a,b,c)=1 in the proof. There is some uncertainty about how the proof would work for negative integers, but it is suggested that it
  • #1
math_grl
49
0
So you see it all over the place, [tex]\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-5})[/tex] is not a UFD by finding an element such that it has two distinct prime factorizations...but what about showing that [tex]\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{5})[/tex] is a UFD?

I'm only concerned with this particular example, I might have questions later on regarding a general method.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Isn't the proof goes like the proof of the fundamental theorem of arithmetic? the uniqueness part.
 
  • #3
I guess it could be. So you are saying that you take some random element [tex]a + b\sqrt{5} \in \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{5})[/tex] and claim there are two distinct prime factorizations and show they actually differ by a unit?
 
  • #4
Well if you show it for the integers coeffiecients then it will obviously follow for rational coeffiecnts (I am referring to a,b), by taking common denominator in both sides and then multiply by the lcm of the two denominators of both sides we reducing the problem to integer coeffiecints.

I believe that because Q(\sqrt 5) is spanned by 1 and \sqrt 5
It's enough to show that [tex](a+b\sqrt 5) c \sqrt 5=d+e\sqrt 5[/tex] and [tex](a+b\sqrt 5) c =d+e\sqrt 5[/tex], where all the parameters are integers, is uniquely factorised (this obviously follows from the uniquness in simple integers).
Obviously in the proof we should impose the condition that gcd(a,b,c)=1 otherwise we can divide both sides by gcd(a,b,c).

I am just not sure how this will follow for negative integers, maybe this works upto a sign in the whole integers.
 
  • #5


I understand the importance of rigorous proof and evidence in mathematical concepts such as unique factorization domains (UFDs). While it is true that \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-5}) is not a UFD, it is also important to note that not all quadratic number fields are UFDs. In fact, there are infinitely many quadratic number fields that are not UFDs.

In the case of \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{5}), we can show that it is indeed a UFD by providing a proof that every nonzero, non-unit element in this field has a unique prime factorization. This can be done by using the fundamental theorem of arithmetic, which states that every positive integer can be uniquely expressed as a product of prime numbers.

In the case of \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{5}), we can prove that it is a UFD by showing that every nonzero, non-unit element can be written as a product of irreducible elements (elements that cannot be factored further). This can be done by considering the norm of elements in this field, which is defined as the product of the element and its complex conjugate. Using the fact that the norm is multiplicative, we can show that every nonzero, non-unit element in \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{5}) can be written as a product of irreducible elements.

Furthermore, we can also show that the factorization is unique by assuming that there are two distinct prime factorizations for a given element and then showing that they must be equal. This can be done by using the properties of the norm and the fact that the elements in \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{5}) have unique factorizations in the Gaussian integers (a UFD).

In conclusion, while it is true that \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{5}) is a UFD, it is not a general rule that all quadratic number fields are UFDs. Each field must be analyzed individually to determine if it satisfies the properties of a UFD.
 

What is a unique factorization domain?

A unique factorization domain (UFD) is a mathematical structure in abstract algebra that satisfies two properties: every non-zero element can be uniquely written as a product of irreducible elements, and this factorization is unique up to order and multiplication by units. In other words, every element in a UFD can be broken down into a product of prime elements in only one way.

What is the difference between a UFD and a Euclidean domain?

A Euclidean domain is a type of unique factorization domain where a division algorithm can be applied to any two elements, resulting in a quotient and remainder that are both in the domain. In other words, a Euclidean domain has a well-defined notion of size for its elements. While all Euclidean domains are UFDs, the converse is not necessarily true.

How do you know if a ring is a UFD?

To determine if a ring is a UFD, one must check that every non-zero, non-unit element can be factored into a product of irreducible elements and that this factorization is unique up to order and multiplication by units. One way to do this is to check if the ring is a PID (principal ideal domain), which is a type of UFD. Another way is to use the fundamental theorem of arithmetic, which states that every non-zero integer can be factored into a product of primes in only one way.

What are some examples of UFDs?

Some examples of UFDs include the integers, polynomial rings over a field, and the Gaussian integers. In general, most rings of integers in number fields are UFDs. However, not all rings of integers in algebraic number fields are UFDs, and there are also non-commutative examples of UFDs.

Why are unique factorization domains important in mathematics?

Unique factorization domains are important in mathematics because they allow us to factor elements into their most basic components in a unique way. This can help simplify calculations and prove important theorems, such as the fundamental theorem of arithmetic. UFDs also have applications in number theory, algebraic geometry, and coding theory.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
549
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
984
Back
Top