Flying Machines: Lifting Bodies & Flying Saucers

In summary: Assuming mach numbers of 10 and small deflection angles (angles of top or bottom surfaces witht the chord) like 20 degrees, the temperature rise is 4-5 times the ambient. Granted that the temperature 4-5 times the ambient would be quite high, given that these things operate at high altitudes where temperatures are low, I'll say temperature is not an overwhelming...
  • #1
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
4,446
558
Lifting bodies and flying saucers, are they aerodynamic or have properties
that are worth pursuing?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Lifting bodies are most definitely a highly researched area in aerodynamics. The space shuttle is the most widely known lifting body aircraft today. NASA did a lot of lifting body work in the X series aircraft back in the '60s. The latest concepts for the hypersonic transports and future aircraft are all lifting bodies as well.

I don't think the flying saucer has any hope in our current technology. A couple of programs did look into it though.
 
  • #3
FredGarvin said:
The latest concepts for the hypersonic transports and future aircraft are all lifting bodies as well.
expansion: Hypersonic aircraft research is focusing on lifting bodies because of heat issues. On a plane with sharp edges, the shock wave is touching the aircraft and heat builds up there. Lifting bodies are blunt and create an insulating cushion of air between themselves and their shock wave. They literally ride their own shock wave (some have been called "waveriders").
 
  • #4
russ_watters said:
expansion: Hypersonic aircraft research is focusing on lifting bodies because of heat issues. On a plane with sharp edges, the shock wave is touching the aircraft and heat builds up there. Lifting bodies are blunt and create an insulating cushion of air between themselves and their shock wave. They literally ride their own shock wave (some have been called "waveriders").

Either Buzz Aldrin or Gordon Cooper once commented that a saucer shaped craft wouldn't create a sonic boom. I have no idea is correct or not, but apparently it was thought to be true at one time.
 
  • #5
The way I understand it, the shock wave around a lifting body is curved, not sharp like on an angular aircraft and that causes the shock wave to be less concentrated and dissipate faster. And I guess with no nose at all, a saucer would have an even more irregular shock wave.
 
  • #6
It was observed that it was easier(actually the power required is lesser) to overcome gravitation by rotary motion when compared to thrust. The shape of flying saucers may have the reason of similar kind. If the top and bottom surfaces are designed aerodynamically and with rotary motion, the air resistance can be minimized.

Having said that, I confess I didn't make indepth study of the science. I often wonder them as the time machines of our future folks :tongue2:
 
  • #7
Would a flying saucer be a lifting body? i have seen some wacky ideas to
make them fly.
 
  • #8
russ_watters said:
expansion: Hypersonic aircraft research is focusing on lifting bodies because of heat issues. On a plane with sharp edges, the shock wave is touching the aircraft and heat builds up there. Lifting bodies are blunt and create an insulating cushion of air between themselves and their shock wave. They literally ride their own shock wave (some have been called "waveriders").

Just a comment. The last models of X series I've seen were not blunt nosed. It seems that blunt nose design is not the current way of making it better... I don't know why.
 
  • #9
The most roundest lifting body I can think of was the X-24:
http://users.dbscorp.net/jmustain/X-24a.jpg [Broken]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
FredGarvin said:
The most roundest lifting body I can think of was the X-24:
http://users.dbscorp.net/jmustain/X-24a.jpg [Broken]

Now that was a strange looking bird, if its what i recall, twin engined prop almost circular body?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
wolram said:
Now that was a strange looking bird, if its what i recall, twin engined prop almost circular body?
Nope. She was a bath tub shaped lifting body that had a rocket. This, believe it or not, was the great great great great great grandfather of the space shuttle.
 
  • #12
FredGarvin said:
Nope. She was a bath tub shaped lifting body that had a rocket. This, believe it or not, was the great great great great great grandfather of the space shuttle.

she was the great great great great great grandfather of the space shuttle?
 
  • #13
Looks a lot like the X-38, IMO.

Lifting bodies will be used for any re-entry vehicle where you want or need to limit the g-loading on the passengers or cargo.
 
  • #14
Clausius2 said:
Just a comment. The last models of X series I've seen were not blunt nosed. It seems that blunt nose design is not the current way of making it better... I don't know why.

Assuming mach numbers of 10 and small deflection angles (angles of top or bottom surfaces witht the chord) like 20 degrees, the temperature rise is 4-5 times the ambient.
My book here says that providing best air compression to the scramjet is an essential consideration of the design.
Granted that the temperature 4-5 times the ambient would be quite high, given that these things operate at high altitudes where temperatures are low, I'll say temperature is not an overwhelming consideration.
 
  • #15
yourdadonapogostick said:
she was the great great great great great grandfather of the space shuttle?
Point taken! Good catch.
 
  • #16
FredGarvin said:
The most roundest lifting body I can think of was the X-24:
http://users.dbscorp.net/jmustain/X-24a.jpg [Broken]
For shame, Fred! A fellow Avro fan failed to mention http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/mufonontario/avro/avrocar.html? :tongue:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #18
Danger said:
For shame, Fred! A fellow Avro fan failed to mention http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/mufonontario/avro/avrocar.html? :tongue:
I never thought that the Avro Car was an actual lifting body. Was it supposed to be? I'm going to have to check in on that one!
 
  • #19
That's a cool link Ivan. How do you find that stuff?
 
  • #20
"Mainstream" UFO literature.

There are a few sites that are quite reliable.
 

1. What is a lifting body?

A lifting body is a type of aircraft design that uses the shape of its body to generate lift, rather than relying on wings. This allows for greater maneuverability and stability in flight.

2. How do flying saucers work?

Flying saucers, also known as disc-shaped aircraft, use a combination of aerodynamic lift and propulsion to fly. They typically have a circular or elliptical shape, which allows for better control and stability in flight.

3. What makes lifting bodies and flying saucers different from traditional airplanes?

Lifting bodies and flying saucers use unconventional designs that allow them to fly without wings. This makes them more efficient in terms of lift and drag, and they are also capable of more advanced maneuvers.

4. What are the potential applications of lifting bodies and flying saucers?

Lifting bodies and flying saucers have potential applications in military, commercial, and space exploration industries. They could be used for surveillance, transportation, and even space missions due to their unique capabilities.

5. Are there any successful examples of lifting bodies and flying saucers?

Yes, there have been several successful examples of lifting bodies and flying saucers in history. Some notable examples include the X-24 and the Avro Canada VZ-9 Avrocar. NASA has also conducted successful tests with lifting body designs, such as the HL-20 and the M2-F1.

Similar threads

  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
646
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
21
Views
2K
Back
Top