Plotting Planets Orbits around Sun using Schwarzchild Metric

In summary, you need to set up a vector of initial conditions for (r, \phi, t, r',\phi', t'), where r and \phi are the polar coordinates, t is time, r' is the speed in the r direction, etc. You would also use a different unit for time, the meter, in order to account for the speed of light. Once you have these you can work out the magnitudes or units to use in the relativistic units, where c=1.
  • #1
shifty89
1
0
Hello, I'm currently studying general relatively and am trying to plot orbits of planets around the sun using the schwarzchild metric. I've worked out the geodesic equations, working with c=1 to simplify things, and written a MATLAB script to plot trajectories, but I'm struggling to work out what magnitudes or units to use.

Basically i need a vector of initial conditions for (r, [tex]\phi[/tex], t, r',[tex]\phi[/tex]', t'), where r and [tex]\phi[/tex] are the polar coordinates, t is time, r' is the speed in the r direction, etc. Obviously i can set [tex]\phi[/tex] and t = 0 initially. I think t' = 1, i.e. initially time is traveling at the regular speed. This just leaves me with r, r', and [tex]\phi[/tex]' to deal with.

i know that for mercury:
mass of sun = 2x10^30 kg
distance from sun = 5.8x10^10 m
orbital velocity = 4.8x10^3 m/s (would this be phi' ? or would i need to break it up into r and phi components... somehow?!)

but what units should i be working with in the relativistic units where c=1?
apologies if this kind of thing has been asked before or if it seems a little silly, but I am a maths student, we don't generally worry about units!

Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
OK so c not only has value 1 it is also dimensionless in the units we would like to use. In order to achieve this we adopt a new unit for time, the meter! One meter of time is the time it takes light to travel 1m (of distance) (this is the opposite approach to the more familiar 'light year', whereby the measure distance in units usually reserved for time, you get the idea...)

c=(distance light travels in given time interval)/(the time interval)
c=1m/(time to travel 1m)
c=1m/1m=1

To convert from these weird units to the usual you can use 3x10^8 ms^-1=1, so 1s=3x10^8m and hence 1m of time =(1/(3x10^8))s

For less fundamental units than metres,seconds, kg and so on,such a joules and Newtons. For example 10J=10kgm^2s^-2, and since 1s=3x10^8m, s^-2=(9x10^16)^-1 m^-2, so we obtain 10J=1.1x10^-16kg

This is lifted from Schutz Ch1.

Another convention of seen in GR, Geometrized units, is when we set c=1 and G=1 (if we set hbar=1 we then get Planck units), in these units mass gets measured in length too, so as you have probably seen in the Schwarzschild solution 2m/r is dimensionless. Meaning the interval [tex] [ds^2]=L^2 [/tex] (again because [dt^2]=L^2 too as we measure time in length)

The conversion factor is G/c^2 so the Sun's mass of 2x10^30kg is equal to 1.5km.

To see why:

[G]=L^3 M^-1 T^-2

we already had from [c]=1 that L=T, so we have:

[G]=L M^-1

and if now G is to be dimensionless it must also be that L=M so therefore mass is length. If G is also to be not just dimensionless but also 1, then it must be that:

1=(6.673x10^-11) m^3 kg^-1 s^-2
1=(6.673x10^-11) m^3 kg^-1 (9x10^16)^-1 m^-2
1=G/c^2 m/kg

Thus if this is to be 1, then 1kg=G/c^2 m, so 1kg is this fraction of 1 metre.

For a velocity such as the one you quoted, v=4.8x10^3 m/s, well again 1s=3x10^8m, so you need to divide through by a c to get v=1.6x10^-5 where [v]=1 (dimensionless now)
 
Last edited:
  • #3
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometrized_units

You can also simply put factors of c and G back in at the end. For example, if you obtained an expression like 1-v, the 1 is unitless, and the v is unitless in geometrized units. To convert it back to SI units, you'd have to insert a 1/c, making it 1-v/c.
 
  • #4
I think t' = 1, i.e. initially time is traveling at the regular speed. This just leaves me with r, r', and LaTeX Code: \\phi ' to deal with.

Because of various symmetries (See Carroll ch5 available free online), you have various conserved quantities in the Schwarzschild solution, one of them is energy E, and it happens that [tex] \dot{t}=\frac{E}{1-\frac{2M}{r}} [/tex], you have have axial symmetry leading to the analogue of Kepler: [tex] \dot{\phi}=\frac{L}{r^2} [/tex]

You are right to say that initial you can set t=0, phi=0 and this is because of these symmetries (you can't do the same with r- things depend on where you start in radial coordinate). Also because motion occurs in the plane, you can without loss of generality set theta=pi/2, which can massively simplifies your geodesic equations. At the end of all this you should find geodesic equation for timelike particles (in geometrized natural units):

[tex] \frac{1}{2}\dot{r}^2+\left[\frac{1}{2}-\frac{M}{r}+\frac{L^2}{2r^2}-\frac{ML^2}{r^3}\right]=\frac{E^2}{2} [/tex]

You can get a good idea how these look and where the circular orbits are etc by plotting this effective potential.
 

1. What is the Schwarzchild metric?

The Schwarzchild metric is a solution to Einstein's field equations in general relativity that describes the curvature of spacetime around a non-rotating, spherically symmetric mass. It is often used to model the orbits of planets around the sun.

2. How does the Schwarzchild metric explain planetary orbits?

The Schwarzchild metric predicts that the path of a planet around the sun is not a perfect circle, but rather an ellipse. This is because the mass of the sun causes a curvature in spacetime, which affects the path of the planet.

3. Can the Schwarzchild metric be used to predict the orbit of any planet?

Yes, the Schwarzchild metric can be used to predict the orbit of any planet around the sun. However, it becomes less accurate for objects with large masses, such as black holes.

4. How does the Schwarzchild metric differ from Newton's law of gravitation?

The Schwarzchild metric takes into account the effects of gravity on the curvature of spacetime, whereas Newton's law of gravitation only explains the force between two masses. The Schwarzchild metric is a more accurate and comprehensive model for explaining planetary orbits.

5. Are there any limitations to using the Schwarzchild metric for predicting planetary orbits?

While the Schwarzchild metric is a more accurate model than Newton's law of gravitation, it does have limitations. It does not take into account the effects of other celestial bodies or external forces on the orbit, and it becomes less accurate for objects with large masses or high speeds.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
176
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
62
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
528
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
410
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
1K
Back
Top